IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/evarev/v25y2001i2p211-232.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Effectiveness of Continuing Care Interventions for Substance Abusers

Author

Listed:
  • James R. McKay

    (University of Pennsylvania and DeltaMetrics)

Abstract

Substance-abusing patients are frequently urged to participate in lower intensity continuing care interventions, also known as “stepdown care†or “aftercare,†following an initial phase of treatment. Since 1988, 15 controlled studies of continuing care for alcohol or drug abuse have been published, with follow-up data on substance use presented in 14 of these studies. In the studies that featured an active control condition, only 1 of 7 yielded positive findings. In the studies that featured a minimal- or no-treatment control, 3 of 7 studies yielded positive findings. The relative paucity of continuing care studies, coupled with the lack of stronger evidence of clinical effectiveness, provides a convincing rationale for conducting evaluations of continuing interventions, as well as evaluations of combinations of various primary and continuing interventions. Methodological issues in the evaluation of continuing care and potential research questions that could be addressed in long-term follow-up studies are outlined and discussed.

Suggested Citation

  • James R. McKay, 2001. "Effectiveness of Continuing Care Interventions for Substance Abusers," Evaluation Review, , vol. 25(2), pages 211-232, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:evarev:v:25:y:2001:i:2:p:211-232
    DOI: 10.1177/0193841X0102500205
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0193841X0102500205
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/0193841X0102500205?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:evarev:v:25:y:2001:i:2:p:211-232. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.