IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/evarev/v25y2001i2p162-183.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

State-Level Treatment Outcome Studies Using Administrative Databases

Author

Listed:
  • Arthur I. Alterman

    (DeltaMetrics and University of Pennsylvania Center for Studies of Addiction)

  • James Langenbucher

    (Center of Alcohol Studies, Rutgers University, and DeltaMetrics)

  • Randall L. Morrison

    (DeltaMetrics)

Abstract

State substance dependence administrative databases contain both administrative and clinical information on large numbers of patients collected over extended time periods. Access to other state databases—employment, criminal behavior, and Medicaid—has also been achieved in some instances. Such data could prove an important source for the evaluation of long-term treatment outcomes and their determinants. This selected review describes and evaluates the treatment outcome and cost-related findings of the most advanced studies using these databases. A number of these studies have shown that completion of substance dependence treatment is associated with reduced societal costs. Some of these studies have focused on significant subpopulations of patients, including pregnant women and adolescents. A shortcoming of the findings of most of these studies concerns their use of noncompleter or nonrandomly collected comparison groups. The utility of these databases can be enhanced by coupling them with clinical research treatment outcome evaluation approaches.

Suggested Citation

  • Arthur I. Alterman & James Langenbucher & Randall L. Morrison, 2001. "State-Level Treatment Outcome Studies Using Administrative Databases," Evaluation Review, , vol. 25(2), pages 162-183, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:evarev:v:25:y:2001:i:2:p:162-183
    DOI: 10.1177/0193841X0102500203
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0193841X0102500203
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/0193841X0102500203?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:evarev:v:25:y:2001:i:2:p:162-183. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.