IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/evarev/v1y1977i3p399-420.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Toward a Causal Model Approach for Adjusting for Preexisting Differences in the Nonequivalent Control Group Situation

Author

Listed:
  • Jay Magidson

    (Abt Associates, Inc.)

Abstract

The traditional approach for partialing out the effects of confounding factors in a non equivalent control group situation is to calculate a partial correlation coefficient or a (partial) regression coefficient controlling for one or more "covariates." Since the covariates generally are imperfect measures of the factors, this procedure will typically yield biased estimates of effect. An alternative approach, which allows for the presence of measurement error, is discussed and applied to some data from the original Head Start evaluation. Contrary to the original analysis, which found the Head Start program to be totally ineffective, the alternative approach yields small positive estimates of effect. The resulting model is conceptually feasible and fits the data well. However, it is only one of many possible causal models which could have been formulated. Guidelines are needed for building causal models in the evaluation research framework when little is known a priori regarding the causal relationships.

Suggested Citation

  • Jay Magidson, 1977. "Toward a Causal Model Approach for Adjusting for Preexisting Differences in the Nonequivalent Control Group Situation," Evaluation Review, , vol. 1(3), pages 399-420, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:evarev:v:1:y:1977:i:3:p:399-420
    DOI: 10.1177/0193841X7700100303
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0193841X7700100303
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/0193841X7700100303?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. S. D. Hodges & P. G. Moore, 1972. "Data Uncertainties and Least Squares Regression," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series C, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 21(2), pages 185-195, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Wu, Ping & Campbell[maltese cross], Donald T., 1996. "Extending latent variable LISREL analyses of the 1969 Westinghouse Head Start evaluation to Blacks and full year Whites," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 19(3), pages 183-191, August.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Bekker, Paul & Kapteyn, Arie & Wansbeek, Tom, 1987. "Consistent Sets of Estimates for Regressions with Correlated or Uncorrelated Measurement Errors in Arbitrary Subsets of All Variables," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 55(5), pages 1223-1230, September.
    2. Bekker, P. & Kapteyn, A.J. & Wansbeek, T.J., 1984. "Measurement error and endogeneity in regression : Bounds for ML and IV-estimates," Other publications TiSEM 80b5811e-c9b0-4e05-b5fe-0, Tilburg University, School of Economics and Management.
    3. Mengli Zhang & Yang Bai, 2021. "On the use of repeated measurement errors in linear regression models," Metrika: International Journal for Theoretical and Applied Statistics, Springer, vol. 84(5), pages 779-803, July.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:evarev:v:1:y:1977:i:3:p:399-420. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.