IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/envval/v34y2025i2p167-189.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The ecotheological values of Christian climate change activists

Author

Listed:
  • Finlay Malcolm

    (5292The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK of Great Britain and Northern Ireland)

  • Peter Manley Scott

    (5292The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK of Great Britain and Northern Ireland)

Abstract

Given their large number of adherents, and the land and property they own, religious communities have been identified as groups that could have an influence on achieving carbon net-zero. The theological views held by religious communities relating to ecological matters – their “ecotheological values†– play an important role in motivating their environmental concern and action. But which ecotheological ideas are most, and which are least, efficacious in this respect? This paper presents findings salient to this question from a recent survey (n = 319) conducted amongst Christian activists and advocates concerned with climate change. It reports on which ecotheological ideas are most widely and firmly held amongst samples from six Christian environmental activist and advocacy groups in the UK, and discusses the extent to which these ideas are either continuous with mainstream Christian theology, or indicate innovative theological thinking. We find examples of both: some mainstream views are popular, and some are unpopular, amongst our sample, whilst some innovative and newer ideas are becoming more popular, whilst others are resisted. These results will be useful in seeking to promote a greater pro-environmental stance within Christian communities more widely.

Suggested Citation

  • Finlay Malcolm & Peter Manley Scott, 2025. "The ecotheological values of Christian climate change activists," Environmental Values, , vol. 34(2), pages 167-189, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:envval:v:34:y:2025:i:2:p:167-189
    DOI: 10.1177/09632719241300733
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/09632719241300733
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/09632719241300733?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:envval:v:34:y:2025:i:2:p:167-189. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.