Author
Listed:
- Laÿna Droz
(The Graduate School of Frontier Sciences, 34811The University of Tokyo, Bunkyo City, Tokyo, Japan)
- Martin F Fricke
(Escuela Nacional de Estudios Superiores, Unidad Mérida, 7180Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Ciudad de Mexico, Mexico)
- Nakul Heroor
(197678Rachel Carson Center for Environment and Society, Ludwig Maximilian University of Munich, Munchen, Bayern, Germany)
- Romaric Jannel
(Institute for Research in Humanities, 12918Kyoto University, and Collège international de philosophie, Kyoto, Japan)
- Orika Komatsubara
(Tohoku University, Sendai, Miyagi, Japan)
- Concordia Marie A Lagasca-Hiloma
(School of Arts and Sciences, 608616Isabela State University-Cauayan, Cauayan City, Isabela, Philippines)
- Paul Mart Jeyand J Matangcas
(Faculty of Information and Communication Studies, 54732University of the Philippines Open University, Laguna, Calabarzon, Philippines)
- Hesron H Sihombing
(2927University of Denver/Iliff School of Theology, Denver, Colorado, USA)
Abstract
Environmental philosophy – broadly conceived as using philosophical tools to develop ideas related to environmental issues – is conducted and practised in highly diverse ways in different contexts and traditions in Asia. ‘Asian environmental philosophy’ can be understood to include Asian traditions of thought as well as grassroots perspectives on environmental issues in Asia. Environmental issues have sensitive political facets tied to who has the legitimacy to decide about how natural resources are used. Because of this, the works, practices, and researchers in Asian environmental philosophy are exposed to being (mis)used by diverse stakeholders and actors to support political ends not related to environmental sustainability. Two processes are at play at the nexus of the construction of identities in relation to conceptualisations of nature: eco-orientalism and ecological nationalisms. This paper analyzes and exemplifies these dynamics through a conceptual framework that distinguishes ideological and socio-technical explanations of environmental degradation. Finally, to minimise the risks of political misuse, five pathways are presented to carefully help curate environmental, philosophical statements: contextualise, quantify uncertainty and ‘uniqueness’, downscale, confront claims with local realities and literature, and collaborate with researchers from other disciplines. Conjointly, these pathways aim at favouring intercultural collaboration while valuing diversity, thus supporting the development and exchanges in environmental philosophy in Asia and beyond.
Suggested Citation
Laÿna Droz & Martin F Fricke & Nakul Heroor & Romaric Jannel & Orika Komatsubara & Concordia Marie A Lagasca-Hiloma & Paul Mart Jeyand J Matangcas & Hesron H Sihombing, 2025.
"Environmental philosophy in Asia: Between eco-orientalism and ecological nationalisms,"
Environmental Values, , vol. 34(1), pages 84-108, February.
Handle:
RePEc:sae:envval:v:34:y:2025:i:1:p:84-108
DOI: 10.1177/09632719241276999
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:envval:v:34:y:2025:i:1:p:84-108. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.