IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/envirc/v42y2024i7p1293-1312.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Is it worth a punt on pensions? A case study of three municipalities’ use of pension obligation bonds

Author

Listed:
  • Mark Davidson

Abstract

Cities now commonly engage with financial actors, tools, and markets to manage their budgets and associated activities. The growing significance of finance within urban governance is connected by some scholars to the latter’s increasingly speculative character. One area of urban governance where financial tools are now commonly used for speculative ends are public pensions. Across the United States, many state and local governments face large unfunded pension liabilities. In some cases, this has led them to issue pension obligation bonds to reduce their unfunded liabilities. This paper examines the extent of recent pension obligation bond issuance and develops a comparative case study of three Massachusetts municipalities. The research results show that the speculative content of pension obligation bonds varies, even across three Massachusetts municipalities. By using pension obligation bonds, all three case study cities have exposed themselves to different levels of financial risk and have given themselves a long-term governance challenge by installing a speculative financial tool within their budgeting.

Suggested Citation

  • Mark Davidson, 2024. "Is it worth a punt on pensions? A case study of three municipalities’ use of pension obligation bonds," Environment and Planning C, , vol. 42(7), pages 1293-1312, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:envirc:v:42:y:2024:i:7:p:1293-1312
    DOI: 10.1177/23996544241230961
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/23996544241230961
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/23996544241230961?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:envirc:v:42:y:2024:i:7:p:1293-1312. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.