IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/envirc/v39y2021i8p1827-1846.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Desired freight and undesired migrants: Security and market forces at internal EU borders

Author

Listed:
  • Cecilia Vergnano

Abstract

Based on a comparison between two intra-EU border securitization processes in the aftermath of the so-called EU “refugee crisis†of 2015, this article aims to contribute to literature on migration control by stressing the role that market-security dynamics play in state borderwork. The comparison between the French/Italian and the Austrian/Italian borders suggests that the containment of undesired mobility may be better understood in light of economic processes (shared commercial interests between states and the interests of the security industry) whose dimensions are easily quantifiable and comparable but rarely taken into account in research on borders and migration. The analysis highlights that these economic processes, together with other historical, political, social and geomorphological factors, are crucial to explain the emergence of different “local border control regimes†in terms of police cooperation, states’ sovereignty practices and the reconfiguration of migratory routes. As an additional argument, the article brings out the nuances of the EU’s uneven core-periphery dynamics with respect to migration management. Indeed, it shows the active role of peripheral countries, such as Italy, in negotiating, contesting, or actively assuming their role of migration “gatekeepers†.

Suggested Citation

  • Cecilia Vergnano, 2021. "Desired freight and undesired migrants: Security and market forces at internal EU borders," Environment and Planning C, , vol. 39(8), pages 1827-1846, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:envirc:v:39:y:2021:i:8:p:1827-1846
    DOI: 10.1177/2399654421998365
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/2399654421998365
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/2399654421998365?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:envirc:v:39:y:2021:i:8:p:1827-1846. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.