IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/envirc/v39y2021i4p740-758.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Broadening democracy against environmental justice: The example of Montreal borough councils

Author

Listed:
  • Caroline Patsias

Abstract

In this reflection, through observation of citizen participation in several local Montreal municipal councils, I examine whether and how people discuss environmental issues. More specifically, I seek to determine whether the politicization of environmental issues favours the expression of environmental justice. I use this term to refer to the social dimension of environmental questions, given that people of different social classes or identities are not affected by environmental issues in the same way. Does the politicization of environmental issues reproduce an unjust social order or does it encourage the struggle against inequalities? The answer reached here underlines the predominance of politicization through the challenging of democratic processes rather than a substantive politicization (where citizens debate the content of issues and discuss values or identities), which hinders the emergence of environmental justice. This study makes two contributions. First, it points out that, beyond conflict, addressing the avenues that conflict takes is vital. Second, while most analyses consider environmental justice within civil society organizations and on the “margins†, this reflection tackles environmental justice within institutions themselves, namely the favoured places of production of social norms. Apprehending the role of institutions in the politicization of environmental issues is, thus, crucial to highlighting some aspects of social framing and the place of environmental issues in society.

Suggested Citation

  • Caroline Patsias, 2021. "Broadening democracy against environmental justice: The example of Montreal borough councils," Environment and Planning C, , vol. 39(4), pages 740-758, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:envirc:v:39:y:2021:i:4:p:740-758
    DOI: 10.1177/2399654420957663
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/2399654420957663
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/2399654420957663?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Duchesne, Sophie & Haegel, Florence, 2007. "Avoiding or Accepting Conflict in Public Talk," British Journal of Political Science, Cambridge University Press, vol. 37(1), pages 1-22, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jonathan White & Lea Ypi, 2010. "Rethinking the Modern Prince: Partisanship and the Democratic Ethos," Political Studies, Political Studies Association, vol. 58(4), pages 809-828, October.
    2. Jonathan White, 2010. "Europe in the Political Imagination," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 48(4), pages 1015-1038, September.
    3. Jonathan White, 2010. "Europe in the Political Imagination," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 48, pages 1015-1038, September.
    4. Lloyd George Waller, 2013. "Enhancing Political Participation in Jamaica," SAGE Open, , vol. 3(2), pages 21582440134, April.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:envirc:v:39:y:2021:i:4:p:740-758. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.