IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/envirc/v37y2019i6p1126-1147.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Dutch aid and trade policy: Policy discourses versus development practices in the Kenyan water and sanitation sector

Author

Listed:
  • Elisa Savelli

    (IHE Delft Institute for Water Education, The Netherlands)

  • Klaas Schwartz

    (IHE Delft Institute for Water Education, The Netherlands; University of Amsterdam, The Netherlands)

  • Rhodante Ahlers

Abstract

Recent aid and trade policies reveal a ‘paradigm shift’ in which traditional donors have moved away from a focus on poverty alleviation and returned to an approach firmly aimed at economic growth. In prioritising economic growth in their development agenda, donors encourage the private sector as an active partner in development. Dutch development aid is exemplary in following this international trend. By examining development projects financed by Dutch development aid in the Kenyan water supply and sanitation sector, this article analyses to what extent these projects achieve the policy objectives of increasing private sector involvement and investment in development projects. This analysis reveals that both private sector involvement and investment do not materialise in practice. Instead the policy impacts the landscape of non-profit development organisations by pushing them to adopt and incorporate behaviour and practices usually associated with the private sector or to pursue projects targeting the private sector. Rather than leading to increased private sector involvement, the policy thus stimulates a hybridisation of development organisations in which the boundaries between non-profit organisations and private sector companies become increasingly blurred. This process of hybridisation is supported by the Dutch Government as it needs these hybrid organisations to claim success of its aid and trade policy. What results is a rather paradoxical situation where hybrid non-profit organisations are needed to claim success for a policy fostering private sector involvement.

Suggested Citation

  • Elisa Savelli & Klaas Schwartz & Rhodante Ahlers, 2019. "The Dutch aid and trade policy: Policy discourses versus development practices in the Kenyan water and sanitation sector," Environment and Planning C, , vol. 37(6), pages 1126-1147, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:envirc:v:37:y:2019:i:6:p:1126-1147
    DOI: 10.1177/0263774X18803364
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0263774X18803364
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/0263774X18803364?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Jose A. Puppim De Oliveira & Yijia Jing & Paul Collins & Nilima Gulrajani, 2015. "Dilemmas in Donor Design: Organisational Reform and the Future of Foreign Aid Agencies," Public Administration & Development, Blackwell Publishing, vol. 35(2), pages 152-164, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Minasyan, Anna, 2018. "US aid, US educated leaders and economic ideology," European Journal of Political Economy, Elsevier, vol. 55(C), pages 244-257.
    2. Suzuki, Mao, 2020. "Profits before patients? Analyzing donors’ economic motives for foreign aid in the health sector," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 132(C).
    3. Andrew Osehi Enaifoghe & Tafadzwa C. Maramura & Israel K. Ekanade & Hannah Muzee, 2020. "The Socio-Political Dynamic Import of Citizens Participation in Public Resource Management in Relation to Good Governance for South Africa," Journal of Social and Development Sciences, AMH International, vol. 10(3), pages 12-21.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:envirc:v:37:y:2019:i:6:p:1126-1147. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.