IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/envirc/v31y2013i6p953-957.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Revisiting … Spatial Planning, Devolution, and New Planning Spaces

Author

Listed:
  • Phil Allmendinger

    (Department of Land Economy, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB3 9EP, England)

  • Graham Haughton

    (School of Environment, Education and Development, University of Manchester, Manchester, England)

Abstract

No abstract is available for this item.

Suggested Citation

  • Phil Allmendinger & Graham Haughton, 2013. "Revisiting … Spatial Planning, Devolution, and New Planning Spaces," Environment and Planning C, , vol. 31(6), pages 953-957, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:envirc:v:31:y:2013:i:6:p:953-957
    DOI: 10.1068/c3106
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1068/c3106
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1068/c3106?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Graham Haughton & Phil Allmendinger & Stijn Oosterlynck, 2013. "Spaces of Neoliberal Experimentation: Soft Spaces, Postpolitics, and Neoliberal Governmentality," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 45(1), pages 217-234, January.
    2. Phil Allmendinger & Graham Haughton, 2013. "The Evolution and Trajectories of English Spatial Governance: 'Neoliberal' Episodes in Planning," Planning Practice & Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 28(1), pages 6-26, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Mace, Alan & Holman, Nancy & Paccoud, Antoine & Sundaresan, Jayaraj, 2015. "Coordinating density; working through conviction, suspicion and pragmatism," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 56768, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    2. Sara Gonzalez & Stijn Oosterlynck, 2014. "Crisis and resilience in a finance-led city: Effects of the global financial crisis in Leeds," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 51(15), pages 3164-3179, November.
    3. Crystal Legacy & Ryan van den Nouwelant, 2015. "Negotiating Strategic Planning's Transitional Spaces: The Case of ‘Guerrilla Governance’ in Infrastructure Planning," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 47(1), pages 209-226, January.
    4. Andy Inch & Richard Dunning & Aidan While & Hannah Hickman & Sarah Payne, 2020. "‘The object is to change the heart and soul’: Financial incentives, planning and opposition to new housebuilding in England," Environment and Planning C, , vol. 38(4), pages 713-732, June.
    5. Karola Schober & Richard Balling & Tobias Chilla & Hannah Lindermayer, 2023. "European Integration Processes in the EU GI System—A Long-Term Review of EU Regulation for GIs," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(3), pages 1-24, February.
    6. Kristian Olesen & Helen Carter, 2018. "Planning as a barrier for growth: Analysing storylines on the reform of the Danish Planning Act," Environment and Planning C, , vol. 36(4), pages 689-707, June.
    7. Niedziałkowski, Krzysztof & Beunen, Raoul, 2019. "The risky business of planning reform – The evolution of local spatial planning in Poland," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 85(C), pages 11-20.
    8. James Fraser & Joshua Theodore Bazuin & George Hornberger, 2016. "The privatization of neighborhood governance and the production of urban space," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 48(5), pages 844-870, May.
    9. Gareth A S Edwards & Harriet Bulkeley, 2017. "Urban political ecologies of housing and climate change: The ‘Coolest Block’ Contest in Philadelphia," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 54(5), pages 1126-1141, April.
    10. Graham Haughton & Phil Allmendinger, 2016. "Think tanks and the pressures for planning reform in England," Environment and Planning C, , vol. 34(8), pages 1676-1692, December.
    11. Phil Allmendinger & Graham Haughton & Edward Shepherd, 2016. "Where is planning to be found? Material practices and the multiple spaces of planning," Environment and Planning C, , vol. 34(1), pages 38-51, February.
    12. Cesare Di Feliciantonio & Cian O’Callaghan, 2020. "Struggles over property in the ‘post-political’ era: Notes on the political from Rome and Dublin," Environment and Planning C, , vol. 38(2), pages 195-213, March.
    13. Feitelson, Eran, 2018. "Shifting sands of planning in Israel," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 79(C), pages 695-706.
    14. Talia Margalit & Nurit Alfasi, 2016. "The undercurrents of entrepreneurial development: Impressions from a globalizing city," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 48(10), pages 1967-1987, October.
    15. Nancy Holman & Alessandra Mossa & Erica Pani, 2018. "Planning, value(s) and the market: An analytic for “what comes next?â€," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 50(3), pages 608-626, May.
    16. Anja Jørgensen & Mia Arp Fallov & Maria Casado-Diaz & Rob Atkinson, 2020. "Rural Cohesion: Collective Efficacy and Leadership in the Territorial Governance of Inclusion," Social Inclusion, Cogitatio Press, vol. 8(4), pages 229-241.
    17. David Etherington & Martin Jones, 2018. "Re-stating the post-political: Depoliticization, social inequalities, and city-region growth," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 50(1), pages 51-72, February.
    18. Thaler, Thomas & Löschner, Lukas & Hartmann, Thomas, 2017. "The introduction of catchment-wide co-operations: Scalar reconstructions and transformation in Austria in flood risk management," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 68(C), pages 563-573.
    19. Salla Jokela, 2020. "Transformative city branding and the evolution of the entrepreneurial city: The case of ‘Brand New Helsinki’," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 57(10), pages 2031-2046, August.
    20. Carol Ludwig & Gregory Ludwig, 2014. "Empty gestures? A review of the discourses of ‘localism’ from the practitioner’s perspective," Local Economy, London South Bank University, vol. 29(3), pages 245-256, May.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:envirc:v:31:y:2013:i:6:p:953-957. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.