IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/envirc/v30y2012i6p1015-1028.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Migration and Environmental Change in International Governance: The Case of the European Union

Author

Listed:
  • Andrew Geddes

    (Department of Politics, University of Sheffield, Elmfield, Northumberland Road, Sheffield S10 2TU, England)

  • William Somerville

    (Migration Policy Institute, 1400 16th St NW, Ste 300, Washington, DC 20036, USA)

Abstract

With this paper we analyse and assess the role of the European Union (EU) in the governance of migration linked to environmental change. We trace the emergence of migration linked to environmental change as an issue on the EU agenda and examine both issue definition and the institutional location of EU responses. The EU is identified as a particularly significant potential actor in the broader debate about environmental change and migration, as it is the world's most developed form of regionalised supranational governance with responsibilities in the areas of both environmental and migration policy, albeit with little connection made, as yet, between the two. We show that the relationship between migration and environmental change emerged as an issue for the EU's foreign policy community before becoming part of the EU's ‘Global Approach to Migration and Mobility’. We argue that there is a compelling argument for consideration of migration and environmental change in the context of adaptation and development policies, as well as broader debate and contestation of the meaning of these policies. This involves a rethink of some of the precepts and practices informing EU migration and asylum policy.

Suggested Citation

  • Andrew Geddes & William Somerville, 2012. "Migration and Environmental Change in International Governance: The Case of the European Union," Environment and Planning C, , vol. 30(6), pages 1015-1028, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:envirc:v:30:y:2012:i:6:p:1015-1028
    DOI: 10.1068/c1249j
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1068/c1249j
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1068/c1249j?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Virginie Guiraudon, 2000. "European Integration and Migration Policy: Vertical Policy‐making as Venue Shopping," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 38(2), pages 251-271, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Frank R. Baumgartner & Christine Mahoney, 2008. "Forum Section: The Two Faces of Framing," European Union Politics, , vol. 9(3), pages 435-449, September.
    2. Fulya Memisoglu, 2014. "Between the legacy of nation-state and forces of globalisation: Turkey’s management of mixed migration flows," EUI-RSCAS Working Papers p0419, European University Institute (EUI), Robert Schuman Centre of Advanced Studies (RSCAS).
    3. Philip Catney & John M Henneberry, 2016. "Public entrepreneurship and the politics of regeneration in multi-level governance," Environment and Planning C, , vol. 34(7), pages 1324-1343, November.
    4. Monheim, Jenny, 2007. "Strategic asylum law making in Europe: institutional locus," CSLE Discussion Paper Series 2007-02, Saarland University, CSLE - Center for the Study of Law and Economics.
    5. Aynsley Kellow, 2012. "Multi-level and multi-arena governance: the limits of integration and the possibilities of forum shopping," International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics, Springer, vol. 12(4), pages 327-342, November.
    6. Ségolène Barbou des Places, 2003. "Evolution of Asylum Legislation in the EU: Insights from Regulatory Competition Theory," EUI-RSCAS Working Papers 16, European University Institute (EUI), Robert Schuman Centre of Advanced Studies (RSCAS).
    7. Florian Trauner & Ariadna Ripoll Servent, 2016. "The Communitarization of the Area of Freedom, Security and Justice: Why Institutional Change does not Translate into Policy Change," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 54(6), pages 1417-1432, November.
    8. Gabriele Orcalli, 2007. "Constitutional choice and European immigration policy," Constitutional Political Economy, Springer, vol. 18(1), pages 1-20, March.
    9. Rossi, Enzo, 2017. "Superseding Dublin: The European asylum system as a non-cooperative game," International Review of Law and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 51(C), pages 50-59.
    10. Dodevska, Iva, 2022. "Boundary Integrationism and its Subject: Shifts and Continuities in the EU Framework on Migrant Integration," SocArXiv 9ef58, Center for Open Science.
    11. Christopher J Williams & Shaun Bevan, 2019. "The effect of public attitudes toward the European Union on European Commission policy activity," European Union Politics, , vol. 20(4), pages 608-628, December.
    12. Hannah Murphy & Aynsley Kellow, 2013. "Forum Shopping in Global Governance: Understanding States, Business and NGOs in Multiple Arenas," Global Policy, London School of Economics and Political Science, vol. 4(2), pages 139-149, May.
    13. Theodore Baird, 2017. "Non-State Actors and the New Intergovernmentalism," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 55(6), pages 1192-1202, November.
    14. Sabine Saurugger, 2016. "Sociological Approaches to the European Union in Times of Turmoil," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 54(1), pages 70-86, January.
    15. des Places, Segolene Barbou & Deffains, Bruno, 2003. "Cooperation in the shadow of regulatory competition: the case of asylum legislation in Europe," International Review of Law and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 23(4), pages 345-364, December.
    16. Darshan Vigneswaran, 2020. "International Migration and Gentrification: Territorial Exclusion at National and Urban Scales," Environment and Planning C, , vol. 38(3), pages 557-576, May.
    17. Ingrid Palmary & Thea De Gruchy & Ali Ashraf & Koh Chiu Yee & Kellynn Wee & Charmian Goh & Brenda S.A. Yeoh, 2018. "How unpopular policies are made: Examples from South Africa, Singapore, and Bangladesh," WIDER Working Paper Series wp-2018-38, World Institute for Development Economic Research (UNU-WIDER).
    18. Jenny Monheim-Helstroffer & Marie Obidzinski, 2011. "The EU legislation game: the case of asylum law," Working Papers of BETA 2011-16, Bureau d'Economie Théorique et Appliquée, UDS, Strasbourg.
    19. Mathias Czaika & Heidrun Bohnet & Federica Zardo, 2024. "Categorical and spatial interlinkages within the European migration policy mix," European Union Politics, , vol. 25(1), pages 173-196, March.
    20. Ingrid Palmary & Thea De Gruchy & Ali Ashraf & Koh Chiu Yee & Kellynn Wee & Charmian Goh & Brenda S.A. Yeoh, 2018. "How unpopular policies are made: Examples from South Africa, Singapore, and Bangladesh," WIDER Working Paper Series 038, World Institute for Development Economic Research (UNU-WIDER).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:envirc:v:30:y:2012:i:6:p:1015-1028. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.