IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/envirc/v27y2009i4p632-646.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Industry Building as Contested Market Building: Knowledge, Politics, and the Rise of Beijing in China's Virtual Economy

Author

Listed:
  • Jun Zhang

    (Department of Geography, National University of Singapore, 1 Arts Link, Kent Ridge, Singapore 117570)

Abstract

Combining insights from the theory of fields to markets and recent geographic literature on regional innovation, I conceptualize regional industry building as a contested process of market building involving initiatives of both economic actors and political actors in intertwined governmental fields and organizational fields. Market building entails the contribution of knowledge brokers capable of bridging the gap between the local industrial community and global leaders. Moreover, it requires the institutionalization of a stable governance structure to enable the rise of productivity-enhancing new entrepreneurship, especially to minimize ‘unproductive’ endeavors of technological entrepreneurs in fighting against powerful incumbents and reactionary institutions. From a policy perspective, regional industry building entails not only policies facilitating the pooling of glocal knowledge brokers at the regional scale, but also institutional reform and political transformation in the national arena, especially in an emerging market economy.

Suggested Citation

  • Jun Zhang, 2009. "Industry Building as Contested Market Building: Knowledge, Politics, and the Rise of Beijing in China's Virtual Economy," Environment and Planning C, , vol. 27(4), pages 632-646, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:envirc:v:27:y:2009:i:4:p:632-646
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://epc.sagepub.com/content/27/4/632.abstract
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:envirc:v:27:y:2009:i:4:p:632-646. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.