IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/envirc/v27y2009i3p399-412.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Legislative Support for Urban Land-Use Control in China

Author

Listed:
  • Sumei Zhang

    (School of Urban and Public Affairs, University of Louisville, 425 West Bloom Street, Louisville, KY 40208, USA)

  • Kenneth Pearlman

    (Department of City and Regional Planning, Ohio State University, 275 West Woodruff Avenue, Columbus, OH 43210, USA)

Abstract

China is in a transitional period with a decentralized economy operated within a highly centralized governmental structure. With a strong statutory law tradition, the federal government has created a very complicated set of statutes to regulate land-use tenure, land-use rights allocation, and planning activities. Local governments regulate daily land-use transfer activities within the federal framework. China is now looking for a land-use management tool that can effectively regulate individual activities at the local level. The statutory plan framework (local-level land-use plans similar to zoning ordinances) is one of the attempts. Shenzhen is the first city to adopt statutory plans as local bylaws and its experience provides other cities with a good example of how to incorporate public participation into land-use management. However, the experience in Shenzhen also exposes a number of problems related to the overall distribution of power in the current federal structure. With most cities lacking power to issue local bylaws, the statutory plan concept is not universally applicable. China should at least delegate the full power to regulate local land-use activities to local communities. Effective control of local land-use activities calls for such decentralization. Further, the existence of a weak judicial and extremely strong administrative system is another issue of concern. Both systems need to be further reformed to achieve a balanced distribution of power between administrative and judicial implementation of land-use regulation.

Suggested Citation

  • Sumei Zhang & Kenneth Pearlman, 2009. "Legislative Support for Urban Land-Use Control in China," Environment and Planning C, , vol. 27(3), pages 399-412, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:envirc:v:27:y:2009:i:3:p:399-412
    DOI: 10.1068/c0774b
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1068/c0774b
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1068/c0774b?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Kung, James Kai-sing, 2000. "Common Property Rights and Land Reallocations in Rural China: Evidence from a Village Survey," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 28(4), pages 701-719, April.
    2. Krusekopf, Charles C., 2002. "Diversity in land-tenure arrangements under the household responsibility system in China," China Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 13(2-3), pages 297-312.
    3. Jieming Zhu, 2002. "Urban Development under Ambiguous Property Rights: A Case of China’s Transition Economy," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 26(1), pages 41-57, March.
    4. Ling Hin Li, 1999. "Impacts of Land Use Rights Reform on Urban Development in China," Review of Urban & Regional Development Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 11(3), pages 193-205, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Hyun Bang Shin, 2009. "Residential Redevelopment and the Entrepreneurial Local State: The Implications of Beijing’s Shifting Emphasis on Urban Redevelopment Policies," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 46(13), pages 2815-2839, December.
    2. Webster, Chris & Wu, Fulong & Zhang, Fangzhu & Sarkar, Chinmoy, 2016. "Informality, property rights, and poverty in China’s “favelas”," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 78(C), pages 461-476.
    3. Xu, Yuting & Huang, Xianjin & Bao, Helen X.H. & Ju, Xiang & Zhong, Taiyang & Chen, Zhigang & Zhou, Yan, 2018. "Rural land rights reform and agro-environmental sustainability: Empirical evidence from China," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 74(C), pages 73-87.
    4. Le, Minh Khue & Zhu, Jieming & Nguyen, Hoang Linh, 2022. "Land redevelopment under ambiguous property rights in transitional Vietnam: A case of spatial transformation in Hanoi city center," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 120(C).
    5. Liu, Min & Huang, Jikun & Dries, Liesbeth & Heijman, Wim & Zhu, Xueqin, 2020. "How does land tenure reform impact upon pastoral livestock production? An empirical study for Inner Mongolia, China," China Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 60(C).
    6. Joshua Hall & Yang Zhou, 2017. "The Sinuous Dragon: Economic Freedom and Economic Growth in China," Working Papers 17-12, Department of Economics, West Virginia University.
    7. Li, Bowei & Shen, Yueqin, 2021. "Effects of land transfer quality on the application of organic fertilizer by large-scale farmers in China," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 100(C).
    8. Jia, Lili & Petrick, Martin, 2014. "How does land fragmentation affect off-farm labor supply: panel data evidence from China," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 45(3), pages 369-380.
    9. Leight, Jessica, 2016. "Reallocating wealth? Insecure property rights and agricultural investment in rural China," China Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 40(C), pages 207-227.
    10. Jieming Zhu & Yan Guo, 2014. "Fragmented Peri-urbanisation Led by Autonomous Village Development under Informal Institution in High-density Regions: The Case of Nanhai, China," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 51(6), pages 1120-1145, May.
    11. Christophe Muller & Huijie Yan, 2018. "Household Fuel Use in Rural China," AMSE Working Papers 1808, Aix-Marseille School of Economics, France.
    12. Jiang Xu & Anthony Yeh & Fulong Wu, 2009. "Land Commodification: New Land Development and Politics in China since the Late 1990s," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 33(4), pages 890-913, December.
    13. Lu Cai & Chaoqing Chai & Bangbang Zhang & Feng Yang & Wei Wang & Chengdong Zhang, 2022. "The Theoretical Approach and Practice of Farmland Rights System Reform from Decentralization to Centralization Promoting Agricultural Modernization: Evidence from Yuyang District in Shaanxi, China," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(12), pages 1-16, December.
    14. Wu, Ziping, 2006. "Land Distributional and Income Effects of the Chinese Land Rental Market," 2006 Annual Meeting, August 12-18, 2006, Queensland, Australia 25294, International Association of Agricultural Economists.
    15. Yang, Chen & Qian, Zhu, 2022. "The complexity of property rights embedded in the rural-to-urban resettlement of China: A case of Hangzhou," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 122(C).
    16. Klaus Deininger & Songqing Jin, 2008. "Land Sales and Rental Markets in Transition: Evidence from Rural Vietnam," Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, Department of Economics, University of Oxford, vol. 70(1), pages 67-101, February.
    17. Yuheng Li, 2011. "Urban‐rural interaction in China: historic scenario and assessment," China Agricultural Economic Review, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 3(3), pages 335-349, September.
    18. Bowei Li & Qiyan Zeng, 2022. "The Effect of Land Right Stability on the Application of Fertilizer Reduction Technologies—Evidence from Large-Scale Farmers in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(13), pages 1-13, July.
    19. Wang, Xiaobing & Yu, Xiaohua, 2011. "Scale Effects, Technical Efficiency and Land Lease in China," 2011 ASAE 7th International Conference, October 13-15, Hanoi, Vietnam 290658, Asian Society of Agricultural Economists (ASAE).
    20. Qingshu Xie & A.R. Ghanbari Parsa & Barry Redding, 2002. "The Emergence of the Urban Land Market in China: Evolution, Structure, Constraints and Perspectives," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 39(8), pages 1375-1398, July.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:envirc:v:27:y:2009:i:3:p:399-412. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.