IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/envirc/v24y2006i4p597-614.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Institutional Reform in the Provision of Public Services in Hong Kong: An Efficiency Evaluation

Author

Listed:
  • Richard M Walker

    (Centre of Urban Planning and Environmental Management, University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong; and School of City and Regional Planning, Cardiff University, Wales)

  • Ling Hin Li

    (Centre for Real Estate and Economics, Department of Real Estate and Construction, University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong)

Abstract

Although efficiency theories have been adopted by governments around the world to improve public services, Hong Kong escaped their prescriptions until recently. In order to evaluate why such policies have been adopted, the authors develop a theory-led evaluation in which public choice theory and transaction-costs economics are synthesised to present a contingent efficiency framework. The study is focused upon the housing, planning, and lands arena, and includes analysis of policy documents and interviews with a range of civil servant, politicians, professional bodies, and private sector providers. The findings indicate that efficiency theories now explain institutional reform in Hong Kong—the variables of competition, size, asset specificity, monopoly, and change in public officials, together with the context within which public organisations in Hong Kong work, explain why such policies have now been pursued.

Suggested Citation

  • Richard M Walker & Ling Hin Li, 2006. "Institutional Reform in the Provision of Public Services in Hong Kong: An Efficiency Evaluation," Environment and Planning C, , vol. 24(4), pages 597-614, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:envirc:v:24:y:2006:i:4:p:597-614
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://epc.sagepub.com/content/24/4/597.abstract
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:envirc:v:24:y:2006:i:4:p:597-614. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.