IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/envirc/v24y2006i4p533-552.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Monitoring Spatial Strategies: The Case of Local Development Documents in England

Author

Listed:
  • Cecilia Wong
  • Mark Baker
  • Sue Kidd

    (Department of Civic Design, University of Liverpool, 74 Bedford Street South, Liverpool L69 7ZQ, England)

Abstract

Since its recent overhaul, the British planning system has placed a strong emphasis on the development of ‘spatial’ rather than purely ‘land-use’ plans, and on the importance of adopting a systematic approach towards strategy monitoring. Such an evidence-based approach to spatial planning is already in use at the pan-European level and in Northern America. The authors aim to discuss the latest methodological developments in the monitoring of complex spatial strategies by examining the monitoring framework for local development documents in England. They examine the concept of spatial planning, issues and challenges surrounding spatial policy monitoring, and some emerging views over policy monitoring and evaluation. They then discuss the relevance of these latest ideas and different design principles of indicator frameworks to underpin the development of a monitoring framework for local development documents. Six core design components are discussed: the structure – performance model; the objectives – targets – indicators approach; a nested hierarchy of indicators; a framework of indicators; the use of analytical indicator bundles; and analytical principles. The authors identify the gaps and challenges in the developing monitoring framework for spatial planning in England and the wider, transferable, lessons to be learnt for complex policy monitoring.

Suggested Citation

  • Cecilia Wong & Mark Baker & Sue Kidd, 2006. "Monitoring Spatial Strategies: The Case of Local Development Documents in England," Environment and Planning C, , vol. 24(4), pages 533-552, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:envirc:v:24:y:2006:i:4:p:533-552
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://epc.sagepub.com/content/24/4/533.abstract
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Sergio Segura & Belen Pedregal, 2017. "Monitoring and Evaluation Framework for Spatial Plans: A Spanish Case Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(10), pages 1-19, September.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:envirc:v:24:y:2006:i:4:p:533-552. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.