Author
Listed:
- Duncan Anderson
(Department of Agricultural and Food Economics, Agriculture and Food Science Centre, Queen's University Belfast, Newforge Lane, Belfast BT9 5PX, Northern Ireland)
- Peter Tyler
(Department of Land Economy, University of Cambridge, 19 Silver Street, Cambridge CB3 9EP, England)
- Trevor McCallion
(Biometrics Division, Department of Agriculture and Rural Development (NI), Agriculture and Food Science Centre, Newforge Lane, Belfast BT9 5PX, Northern Ireland)
Abstract
The development of rural business-support policy depends on the proper identification of those factors that have a differential impact on the success of rural as opposed to urban businesses. A number of studies have pointed to differences between urban and rural businesses in the business constraints and opportunities they face, and how they respond to them. This issue is investigated by use of a multivariate econometric model to analyse data generated by a survey of almost 800 businesses in all areas of Northern Ireland. The locations of the businesses in the study were mapped carefully according to an urban, accessible-rural, and remote-rural spatial typology. There is particular interest in the shape and form that rural business support policy might take in order to assist businesses in rural areas where there will be a reduction in traditional EU Common Agricultural Policy (CAP) assistance as well as a phased withdrawal of Objective 1 Structural Fund support. This is currently the case in Northern Ireland. The research should be seen as a pilot study designed to demonstrate how further work might be undertaken in an area where the search for appropriate interventions is likely to be a continuing theme in policy debate. Further research might usefully be directed towards examining the factors that are responsible for causing some of the differences observed. The research suggests that the business areas that will have the greatest impact on rural business competitiveness, relative to their more urban counterparts, are training, business-service provision, transport and communication infrastructure, costs of production, and the environment. This complex set of factors cuts across traditional departmental and national boundaries and highlights the importance of ensuring customised rural business support responses and the effective ‘rural proofing’ of strategically important public policies in general.
Suggested Citation
Duncan Anderson & Peter Tyler & Trevor McCallion, 2005.
"Developing the Rural Dimension of Business-Support Policy,"
Environment and Planning C, , vol. 23(4), pages 519-536, August.
Handle:
RePEc:sae:envirc:v:23:y:2005:i:4:p:519-536
DOI: 10.1068/c44m
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:envirc:v:23:y:2005:i:4:p:519-536. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.