IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/envirc/v22y2004i6p859-880.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Support Services for SMEs: Does the ‘Franchisee’ Make a Difference to the Business Link Offer?

Author

Listed:
  • Robert Bennett

    (Department of Geography, University of Cambridge, Downing Place, Cambridge CB2 3EN, England)

  • Paul Robson

    (Aberdeen Business School, The Robert Gordon University, Kaim House, Garthdee Road, Aberdeen AB10 7QE, Scotland)

Abstract

Business Link is a government-financed support body for small firms in England in which local franchisees provide a range of business advice services. Franchisees must act as independent bodies with the franchise as their ‘only line of business’. Yet franchisees are of various types: some are de facto partnerships, some are linked to chambers of commerce, some are linked to other bodies, and some are private sector companies. Although all are arm's length of any related organisation, and work to a standardised contract and target regime, it is possible that the type of franchisee makes a difference to the management of the franchise, how the targets are prioritised, and how this affects referrals and links to other service providers. This in turn could be reflected in the level of market penetration and user experiences. This paper assesses, using analysis of variance, the relationship of the type of franchisee with propensity to charge fees, market penetration, impact, and customer satisfaction. It shows that there are significant effects of the franchise on client impact and satisfaction, but not on market penetration. In general, chambers of commerce and private sector franchisees perform best. But there is immense variability of all measures of performance, with all franchise types providing both high performing and poorly performing Business Links. This variability, which is of long standing, provides one of the strongest challenges to the credibility and justification for providing a government-financed support system. Within this pattern, fees in general have little statistical relationship with client satisfaction.

Suggested Citation

  • Robert Bennett & Paul Robson, 2004. "Support Services for SMEs: Does the ‘Franchisee’ Make a Difference to the Business Link Offer?," Environment and Planning C, , vol. 22(6), pages 859-880, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:envirc:v:22:y:2004:i:6:p:859-880
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://epc.sagepub.com/content/22/6/859.abstract
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Kevin F Mole & George Bramley, 2006. "Making Policy Choices in Nonfinancial Business Support: An International Comparison," Environment and Planning C, , vol. 24(6), pages 885-908, December.
    2. Robert Bennett, 2008. "SME Policy Support in Britain since the 1990s: What have We Learnt?," Environment and Planning C, , vol. 26(2), pages 375-397, April.
    3. Wolfgang Maennig & Michaela Ölschläger & Hans-Jörg Schmidt-Trenz, 2015. "Organisations and regional innovative capability: the case of the chambers of commerce and industry in Germany," Environment and Planning C, , vol. 33(4), pages 811-827, August.
    4. Phillip A. Singerman & Kenneth P. Voytek, 2023. "Measuring What Matters in Business Support Programs," Economic Development Quarterly, , vol. 37(1), pages 106-114, February.
    5. Marta Gancarczyk, 2010. "System wsparcia dla przedsiębiorców - doświadczenia brytyjskie," Gospodarka Narodowa. The Polish Journal of Economics, Warsaw School of Economics, issue 5-6, pages 41-60.
    6. Kevin Mole & Mark Hart & Stephen Roper & David Saal, 2008. "Differential Gains from Business Link Support and Advice: A Treatment Effects Approach," Environment and Planning C, , vol. 26(2), pages 315-334, April.
    7. Robert Wapshott & Oliver Mallett, 2018. "Small and medium-sized enterprise policy: Designed to fail?," Environment and Planning C, , vol. 36(4), pages 750-772, June.
    8. James Derbyshire & Garry Haywood, 2010. "Labour, the Enterprise Gap and the Red Queen," Local Economy, London South Bank University, vol. 25(5-6), pages 494-509, August.
    9. Andrés Barge-Gil & Aurelia Modrego-Rico, 2008. "Are Technology Institutes a Satisfactory Tool for Public Intervention in the Area of Technology? A Neoclassical and Evolutionary Evaluation," Environment and Planning C, , vol. 26(4), pages 808-823, August.
    10. Kevin F Mole & Mark Hart & Stephen Roper & David S Saal, 2011. "Broader or Deeper? Exploring the Most Effective Intervention Profile for Public Small Business Support," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 43(1), pages 87-105, January.
    11. Matthew Cocks, 2016. "Urban entrepreneurialism, global networks and export support: Are UK cities looking east?," Local Economy, London South Bank University, vol. 31(6), pages 690-708, September.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:envirc:v:22:y:2004:i:6:p:859-880. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.