IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/envirc/v22y2004i1p55-76.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Greater London Authority—a Case of Conflict of Cultures? Evidence from the Planning and Environmental Policy Domains

Author

Listed:
  • Yvonne Rydin
  • Andy Thornley
  • Kath Scanlon
  • Karen West

Abstract

The creation of the new Greater London Authority (GLA), with effect from June 2000, has provoked considerable interest in policy and academic circles. It stands as an innovation in London governance, an experiment with the mayoral system in British politics and another example of the New Labour programme of modernisation. For all these reasons, the GLA provides an interesting focus of study. The particular focus of this paper concerns the internal dynamics of the GLA as it strove to establish its policy agenda and modus operandi. We were not so much concerned with policy outcomes in terms of documentation and its orientation, but rather the developing nature of the GLA as an emerging organisation. To this end we analyse the first year of the GLA's operation using the perspective of cultural theory, emphasising the nature of the GLA as a set of overlapping institutions. Developing Hood's and Coyle's applications of cultural theory enables us to comment on the tensions apparent within the GLA in its first year and the prospects for integration across the GLA. It also enables a reassessment of the value of such a cultural theory framework in contexts of organisational evolution.

Suggested Citation

  • Yvonne Rydin & Andy Thornley & Kath Scanlon & Karen West, 2004. "The Greater London Authority—a Case of Conflict of Cultures? Evidence from the Planning and Environmental Policy Domains," Environment and Planning C, , vol. 22(1), pages 55-76, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:envirc:v:22:y:2004:i:1:p:55-76
    DOI: 10.1068/c0214
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1068/c0214
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1068/c0214?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:envirc:v:22:y:2004:i:1:p:55-76. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.