IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/envirc/v19y2001i5p695-711.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Property, Care, and Environment

Author

Listed:
  • John O'Neill

    (Centre for Philosophy, Institute for Environment, Philosophy and Public Policy, Lancaster University, LA1 4YG, England)

Abstract

One influential approach to environmental problems holds that their solution requires the definition of full liberal property rights over goods that will enable their value to be registered in actual or hypothetical markets. How adequate is that solution? In this paper I offer reasons to be sceptical, by placing recent liberal arguments in the context of older debates about property, in particular those concerned with the distribution of care. Although proposals for the extension of liberal property rights over environmental goods often appeal to arguments from the need to distribute care, I show that there are conflicts between them. Care for particular places that embody the life of a community that has an existence over time is often expressed through resistance to liberal property rights. We express mutual obligations to members of a community through a denial of exclusive property rights over certain common goods. Also, what constitutes care for environmental goods itself is contested across class, occupation, culture, and history. Conflicts between those with different conceptions of care are often expressed through conflicts in property rights. The justification of property rights by appeal to particular accounts of proper care has, from the time of Locke to the present, been invoked to legitimate the appropriation of goods. The introduction and maintenance of liberal property-rights regimes involves the creation and sustenance of a particular distribution of social power, and should be understood as such.

Suggested Citation

  • John O'Neill, 2001. "Property, Care, and Environment," Environment and Planning C, , vol. 19(5), pages 695-711, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:envirc:v:19:y:2001:i:5:p:695-711
    DOI: 10.1068/c16s
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1068/c16s
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1068/c16s?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Aguilera-Klink, Federico, 1994. "Some notes on the misuse of classic writings in economics on the subject of common property," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 9(3), pages 221-228, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Meisinger, Norman, 2022. "A tragedy of intangible commons: Riding the socioecological wave," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 193(C).
    2. Joan Pasqual Rocabert, 2005. "Nuevos instrumentos de polĂ­tica ambiental," Working Papers wpdea0510, Department of Applied Economics at Universitat Autonoma of Barcelona.
    3. Rustan M.Si, 2024. "Strengthening the Family Economy through Efforts to Development of Working Capital Investment in Traditional Fishermen in Pati Karya Village, Indonesia," Asian Social Science, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 20(4), pages 1-49, August.
    4. Davis, Derrin & Gartside, Donald F., 2001. "Challenges for economic policy in sustainable management of marine natural resources," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 36(2), pages 223-236, February.
    5. repec:sae:envval:v:6:y:1997:i:2:p:213-233 is not listed on IDEAS
    6. repec:sae:envval:v:13:y:2004:i:4:p:523-544 is not listed on IDEAS

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:envirc:v:19:y:2001:i:5:p:695-711. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.