IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/envirc/v14y1996i1p89-100.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Multiple Environmental Designations: A Case Study of Their Effectiveness for the Ythan Estuary

Author

Listed:
  • A Ross
  • A Stockdale

Abstract

High-value landscapes, habitats, and species are protected increasingly through a range of local, national, and international designations and policies. Often one site may be protected by a multitude of designations. However, international designations are commonly implemented through national mechanisms. Using the Forvie Sands and Ythan Estuary area of northeast Scotland as an example, we review the effectiveness of multiple environmental designations. After an examination of existing and proposed designations for the study area, overlaps and loopholes in environmental protection are identified. We conclude that protection from more than one designation may either afford the site additional protection or emphasise the importance of the site at different levels; local, national, and international. The principal loophole relates to unregulated activities undertaken beyond the designated site which may have an adverse effect on the protected area. Possible solutions include extending the designation to include the sources of the threat or to combine an appropriate designation strategy with effective regulation of the threat itself. In developing designation strategies, environmental protection agencies should consider these options.

Suggested Citation

  • A Ross & A Stockdale, 1996. "Multiple Environmental Designations: A Case Study of Their Effectiveness for the Ythan Estuary," Environment and Planning C, , vol. 14(1), pages 89-100, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:envirc:v:14:y:1996:i:1:p:89-100
    DOI: 10.1068/c140089
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1068/c140089
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1068/c140089?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:envirc:v:14:y:1996:i:1:p:89-100. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.