IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/envirb/v7y1980i3p265-272.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Complexity: Policymakers' Divider and Possible Conqueror

Author

Listed:
  • R G Wyatt

    (University of Melbourne, Department of Town & Regional Planning, Parkville, Victoria, Australia 3052)

Abstract

It is argued that acknowledgement of complexity is followed by feelings of helplessness which generate three distinct policymaking styles. These three, labelled analytical abdication, analytical alchemy, and analytical addiction, are outlined in terms of their logical bases, strengths, and weaknesses. A natural tendency for the emphasis of fashion to oscillate between all three, in order to speed progress towards greater understanding, is demonstrated, and its inhibition by policymakers' general intolerance towards work based on viewpoints radically different from their own is criticised. More tolerance towards useful features of each approach is thus suggested as the best tactic against the growing complexity problem.

Suggested Citation

  • R G Wyatt, 1980. "Complexity: Policymakers' Divider and Possible Conqueror," Environment and Planning B, , vol. 7(3), pages 265-272, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:envirb:v:7:y:1980:i:3:p:265-272
    DOI: 10.1068/b070265
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1068/b070265
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1068/b070265?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:envirb:v:7:y:1980:i:3:p:265-272. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.