IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/envirb/v52y2025i3p646-666.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Text mining public feedback on urban densification plan change in Hamilton, New Zealand

Author

Listed:
  • Xinyu Fu
  • Catherine Brinkley
  • Thomas W Sanchez
  • Chaosu Li

Abstract

Cities worldwide are commonly aspiring to transition from inefficient urban sprawl patterns to more compact and sustainable urban forms. However, urban densification efforts often face significant public resistance or skepticism, hindering at-scale implementation. There is a scarcity of empirical studies identifying the rationale and mechanisms underpinning public opposition to urban density. This study aims to bridge this gap by leveraging novel natural language processing techniques (NLP), combined with mixed-methods analysis of a unique, highly detailed public dataset on urban intensification in Hamilton. This research stands out by proposing a transferable model for rapidly generating insights from large public feedback datasets, and also unveils the polarized and complex, self-interest-driven mechanisms, including NIMBYism (Not In My Back Yard), behind public support or opposition to urban densification. NLP techniques, such as sentiment analysis, topic modeling, and ChatGPT, can be used to offer rapid insights into a large, unstructured public feedback dataset. When combined with submitters’ individual interest representation and identifies, these AI-generated summaries can offer important insights into the hidden rationales behind public opinions, and, more importantly, be used to design tailored public engagement activities to obtain community buy-in.

Suggested Citation

  • Xinyu Fu & Catherine Brinkley & Thomas W Sanchez & Chaosu Li, 2025. "Text mining public feedback on urban densification plan change in Hamilton, New Zealand," Environment and Planning B, , vol. 52(3), pages 646-666, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:envirb:v:52:y:2025:i:3:p:646-666
    DOI: 10.1177/23998083241272097
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/23998083241272097
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/23998083241272097?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:envirb:v:52:y:2025:i:3:p:646-666. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.