IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/envirb/v52y2025i1p131-149.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Quantitative measurement of urban spatial vitality by integrating physical built environment and subjective perception dimensions

Author

Listed:
  • Shaojun Liu
  • Yi Long
  • Ling Zhang
  • Jing Yang
  • Wenfei Dong

Abstract

Urban space vitality is a critical indicator for supporting rational urban spatial planning and updating and formulating sustainable development strategies. However, in many areas (e.g., aging urban areas), there is often a mismatch between the conditions of the physical built environment and its spatial attractiveness. Traditional methods based on physical space design theory often fail to accurately measure the spatial vitality of these areas. Street view images directly reflect the actual construction situation and effectively compensate for the lack of visual, subjective, perception dimension information. This study proposes a novel method that integrates objective and subjective dimensions to measure urban vitality, which is captured by incorporating spatial data of points of interest, building outlines, road networks, and street view images. Then, taking mobile phone signaling data as a source of ground truth validation, we choose Nanjing as a case study to demonstrate that our multidimensional fusion method exhibits higher explanatory power and better alignment with actual conditions by comparing it against single-dimensional methods. The results underscore the importance of integrating subjective and perceptual dimensions in measurements of urban vitality. We believe that the localized samples of the subjective perception survey will further enhance the accuracy and generalizability of this method in the future.

Suggested Citation

  • Shaojun Liu & Yi Long & Ling Zhang & Jing Yang & Wenfei Dong, 2025. "Quantitative measurement of urban spatial vitality by integrating physical built environment and subjective perception dimensions," Environment and Planning B, , vol. 52(1), pages 131-149, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:envirb:v:52:y:2025:i:1:p:131-149
    DOI: 10.1177/23998083241256704
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/23998083241256704
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/23998083241256704?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:envirb:v:52:y:2025:i:1:p:131-149. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.