IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/envirb/v50y2023i2p500-514.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Towards a 15-minute city: A network-based evaluation framework

Author

Listed:
  • Shanqi Zhang
  • Feng Zhen
  • Yu Kong
  • Tashi Lobsang
  • Sicong Zou

Abstract

Developing 15-minute cities, where people can access to living essentials within a 15-minute trip, has become a global effort. In addition to practical exercise, researchers have paid attention to the evaluation of 15-minute cities using home-based accessibility approaches. However, existing approaches do not account for human mobility, an important indicator of how people access and interact with urban amenities. In this study, we propose a novel network-based framework that assesses a 15-minute city considering human mobility patterns. We assume that there exists an optimal mobility network, which would maximize human mobility under the constraints of the current distribution of amenities. Locations where the provision of urban amenities does not match local needs are first identified based on the comparison between optimal mobility patterns and their actual counterparts. Built environment, demographic, and network structure factors that contribute to identified mismatch issues are then examined. The empirical study of Nanjing, China, suggests that the proposed framework could enable a dynamic evaluation of 15-minute cities and could provide important insights on policies and intervention strategies of planning and developing 15-minute cities.

Suggested Citation

  • Shanqi Zhang & Feng Zhen & Yu Kong & Tashi Lobsang & Sicong Zou, 2023. "Towards a 15-minute city: A network-based evaluation framework," Environment and Planning B, , vol. 50(2), pages 500-514, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:envirb:v:50:y:2023:i:2:p:500-514
    DOI: 10.1177/23998083221118570
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/23998083221118570
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/23998083221118570?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:envirb:v:50:y:2023:i:2:p:500-514. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.