IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/envirb/v49y2022i8p2151-2167.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Deserving poor in public sanitation: Tracing the policymaking processes of who gets what, when, how, and why in Delhi

Author

Listed:
  • Tanushree Bhan

Abstract

This study investigates why sanitation outcomes vary across urban poor communities in Delhi, India. Unequal access to quality sanitation has serious implications for the health, dignity, and economic well-being of the poor and public health in general due to risks of environmental contamination. For this multiple-case study, a sample of 7 communities is drawn from slums, public housing, and homeless shelters. The database comprises of direct observations of sanitation outcomes in these communities, interviews with 67 key policy informants, official documents of relevant government agencies, newspaper articles, and court filings. The qualitative dataset is analyzed using process-tracing to uncover policy decisions across communities. Findings show that inequitable sanitation outcomes are manufactured by biases that blame the poor for service deficits and make the provision of entitled benefits contingent on political mobilization of exhibiting “good citizenship.†This has serious implications for democratic accountability between the government and the very citizens that are most in need of public services to meet their sanitation needs.

Suggested Citation

  • Tanushree Bhan, 2022. "Deserving poor in public sanitation: Tracing the policymaking processes of who gets what, when, how, and why in Delhi," Environment and Planning B, , vol. 49(8), pages 2151-2167, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:envirb:v:49:y:2022:i:8:p:2151-2167
    DOI: 10.1177/23998083221089325
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/23998083221089325
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/23998083221089325?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:envirb:v:49:y:2022:i:8:p:2151-2167. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.