IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/envirb/v49y2022i6p1682-1696.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Analyze the usage of urban greenways through social media images and computer vision

Author

Listed:
  • Yang Song
  • Huan Ning
  • Xinyue Ye
  • Divya Chandana
  • Shaohua Wang

Abstract

Urban greenway is an emerging form of urban landscape offering multifaceted benefits to public health, economy, and ecology. However, the usage and user experiences of greenways are often challenging to measure because it is costly to survey such large areas. Based on the online postings from Instagram in 2017, this paper used Computer Vision (CV) technology to analyze and compare how the general public uses two typical greenway parks, The High Line in New York City and the Atlanta Beltline in Atlanta. Face and object detection analysis were conducted to infer user composition, activities, and key experiences. We presented the temporal patterns of Instagram postings as well as the group gatherings, smiling, and representative objects detected from photos. Our results have shown high user engagement levels for both parks while teens are significantly underrepresented. The High Line had more group activities and was more active during weekdays than the Atlanta Beltline. Stronger sense of escape and physical activities can be found in Atlanta Beltline. In summary, social media images like Instagram can provide strong empirical evidence for urban greenway usage when combined with artificial intelligence technologies, which can support the future practice of landscape architecture and urban design.

Suggested Citation

  • Yang Song & Huan Ning & Xinyue Ye & Divya Chandana & Shaohua Wang, 2022. "Analyze the usage of urban greenways through social media images and computer vision," Environment and Planning B, , vol. 49(6), pages 1682-1696, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:envirb:v:49:y:2022:i:6:p:1682-1696
    DOI: 10.1177/23998083211064624
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/23998083211064624
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/23998083211064624?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Xiliang Chen & Gang Li & Lan Yang & Qifan Nie & Xinyue Ye & Yanjun Liang & Tingting Xu, 2020. "Profiling unmanned aerial vehicle photography tourists," Current Issues in Tourism, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 23(14), pages 1705-1710, July.
    2. Yang Song & Bo Zhang, 2020. "Using social media data in understanding site-scale landscape architecture design: taking Seattle Freeway Park as an example," Landscape Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 45(5), pages 627-648, July.
    3. Claudia Fongar & Geir Aamodt & Thomas B. Randrup & Ingjerd Solfjeld, 2019. "Does Perceived Green Space Quality Matter? Linking Norwegian Adult Perspectives on Perceived Quality to Motivation and Frequency of Visits," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(13), pages 1-16, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Bo Zhang & Yang Song & Dingyi Liu & Zhongzhong Zeng & Shuying Guo & Qiuyi Yang & Yuhan Wen & Wenji Wang & Xiwei Shen, 2023. "Descriptive and Network Post-Occupancy Evaluation of the Urban Public Space through Social Media: A Case Study of Bryant Park, NY," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(7), pages 1-17, July.
    2. Märit Jansson & Julia Schneider, 2023. "The Welfare Landscape and Densification—Residents’ Relations to Local Outdoor Environments Affected by Infill Development," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(11), pages 1-17, November.
    3. Qureshi, Salman & Tarashkar, Mahsa & Matloobi, Mansour & Wang, Zhifang & Rahimi, Akbar, 2022. "Understanding the dynamics of urban horticulture by socially-oriented practices and populace perception: Seeking future outlook through a comprehensive review," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 122(C).
    4. Yang Song & Jessica Fernandez & Tong Wang, 2020. "Understanding Perceived Site Qualities and Experiences of Urban Public Spaces: A Case Study of Social Media Reviews in Bryant Park, New York City," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(19), pages 1-15, September.
    5. Catalina Nicolás-Martínez & María Concepción Pérez-Cárceles & Prudencio José Riquelme-Perea & Carmen María Verde-Martín, 2024. "Are Cities Decisive for Life Satisfaction? A Structural Equation Model for the European Population," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 174(3), pages 1025-1051, September.
    6. Yijun Zhang & Suzanne Mavoa & Jinfeng Zhao & Deborah Raphael & Melody Smith, 2020. "The Association between Green Space and Adolescents’ Mental Well-Being: A Systematic Review," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(18), pages 1-26, September.
    7. Xiliang Chen & Gang Li & Muhammad Sajid Mehmood & Qifan Nie & Jie Yu, 2023. "Integration and differentiation: comparison of photography behaviors using unmanned aerial vehicle data in China and Europe," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 10(1), pages 1-11, December.
    8. Liqing Zhang & Yue Wu, 2022. "Negative Associations between Quality of Urban Green Spaces and Health Expenditures in Downtown Shanghai," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(8), pages 1-18, August.
    9. Hansen Li & Matthew H. E. M. Browning & Angel M. Dzhambov & Guodong Zhang & Yang Cao, 2022. "Green Space for Mental Health in the COVID-19 Era: A Pathway Analysis in Residential Green Space Users," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(8), pages 1-18, July.
    10. Chenghao Yang & Tongtong Liu, 2022. "Social Media Data in Urban Design and Landscape Research: A Comprehensive Literature Review," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(10), pages 1-22, October.
    11. KM Atikur Rahman & Md. Abu Naim Shorkar, 2021. "Analyzing Association Between Public Green Space and Self-Esteem Linked to Social Acceptance for Elderly Population in Dhaka," SAGE Open, , vol. 11(4), pages 21582440211, October.
    12. Karim Najar & Ola Nylander & William Woxnerud, 2024. "Social Space Ratio: Calculating the Rate of Public Space Activities That Enhance Social Interaction on a Pedestrian Street in Karlstad, Sweden," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(19), pages 1-46, October.
    13. Chaniporn Thampanichwat & Suphat Bunyarittikit & Chumporn Moorapun & Prima Phaibulputhipong, 2023. "A Content Analysis of Architectural Atmosphere Influencing Mindfulness through the Lens of Instagram," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(13), pages 1-19, June.
    14. Danning Zhang & Gabriel Hoh Teck Ling & Siti Hajar binti Misnan & Minglu Fang, 2023. "A Systematic Review of Factors Influencing the Vitality of Public Open Spaces: A Novel Perspective Using Social–Ecological Model (SEM)," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(6), pages 1-19, March.
    15. Chongxian Chen & Weijing Luo & Haiwei Li & Danting Zhang & Ning Kang & Xiaohao Yang & Yu Xia, 2020. "Impact of Perception of Green Space for Health Promotion on Willingness to Use Parks and Actual Use among Young Urban Residents," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(15), pages 1-21, August.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:envirb:v:49:y:2022:i:6:p:1682-1696. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.