IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/envirb/v48y2021i9p2675-2690.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A multi-dimensional spatial policy model for large-scale multi-municipal Swiss contexts

Author

Listed:
  • Michael Walczak

Abstract

Switzerland’s widely adopted spatial policy rejects the use of new land in favour of promoting the densification of existing buildings or brownfield developments. However, to date there has not been an assessment of the volumetric building reserves that are still available within the current building regulatory framework. This paper addresses this lacuna using a case study of the agglomeration of Lausanne. An automated spatial policy model with particular focus on building density and its volume in residential and mixed-use areas allows for building policy to be quantified, assessed and evaluated on a countrywide scale since it takes the location of the building lot into consideration and cross-references it with the correct building regulation. Three-dimensional comparison allows us to identify whether the maximum volume permitted under the building regulation is greater than the current existing building volume. For the test case, spatial policy model identified 38 hectares of available square metres for densification (‘building surplus’ in the context of existing buildings, either in the form of extending existing buildings or infill development) and 93 hectares of square metres available for new developments (brownfield development of vacant or derelict open land) of residential and mixed-use buildings. At the same time, almost all areas are allocated beyond Lausanne’s inner-city boundaries.

Suggested Citation

  • Michael Walczak, 2021. "A multi-dimensional spatial policy model for large-scale multi-municipal Swiss contexts," Environment and Planning B, , vol. 48(9), pages 2675-2690, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:envirb:v:48:y:2021:i:9:p:2675-2690
    DOI: 10.1177/2399808320985854
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/2399808320985854
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/2399808320985854?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:envirb:v:48:y:2021:i:9:p:2675-2690. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.