IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/envirb/v48y2021i8p2466-2480.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Evaluating the impact mechanism of citizen participation on citizen satisfaction in a smart city

Author

Listed:
  • Hualin Xu

    (Center for Trans-Himalaya Studies, Leshan Normal University, China)

  • Wenlong Zhu

Abstract

Citizen satisfaction is an important issue for global city managers in the construction of a smart city. To date, little research has been done on the effect of citizen participation on citizen satisfaction in a smart city. From the perspective of citizen involvement and based on the theory of involvement and American Customer Satisfaction Index model, this study explores the impact mechanism of citizen participation on citizen satisfaction in a smart city and constructs a theoretical model of citizen satisfaction. The data were collected in Qingdao, which is a smart city in China. The analysis shows that citizen involvement has a significant positive influence on citizen participation both cognitively and affectively. Furthermore, citizen participation produces a direct and significant positive impact on citizen satisfaction. Last, citizen participation can also have a significant positive influence on citizen satisfaction through perceived quality and perceived value. The main contribution of this study focuses on the construction of the impact mechanism model. Based on this model, researchers and city managers can understand the entire reaction process of the citizen ranging from subjective judgement to practical actions and then actual experiences in the construction of a smart city.

Suggested Citation

  • Hualin Xu & Wenlong Zhu, 2021. "Evaluating the impact mechanism of citizen participation on citizen satisfaction in a smart city," Environment and Planning B, , vol. 48(8), pages 2466-2480, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:envirb:v:48:y:2021:i:8:p:2466-2480
    DOI: 10.1177/2399808320980746
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/2399808320980746
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/2399808320980746?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:envirb:v:48:y:2021:i:8:p:2466-2480. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.