IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/envirb/v47y2020i7p1167-1183.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Statistical validation of utility of head-mounted display projection-based experimental impression evaluation for sequential streetscapes

Author

Listed:
  • Shoko Nishio
  • Fumiko Ito

Abstract

This study compared the impression structure of streetscapes gained from field experiments with that from head-mounted display virtual reality experiments. The results were as follows: (1) the field experiment experience had a slight influence on the impressions reported from the head-mounted display experiment; (2) few items exhibited significant differences in impression values for the two experiments; (3) the impression structure comprised three factors—“Openness,†“Balance,†and “Activity†—in both experiments, and (4) no significant difference appeared between the two experiments relative to the subscale scores of these three factors. These results show that head-mounted display experiments can substitute field experiments.

Suggested Citation

  • Shoko Nishio & Fumiko Ito, 2020. "Statistical validation of utility of head-mounted display projection-based experimental impression evaluation for sequential streetscapes," Environment and Planning B, , vol. 47(7), pages 1167-1183, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:envirb:v:47:y:2020:i:7:p:1167-1183
    DOI: 10.1177/2399808318821693
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/2399808318821693
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/2399808318821693?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:envirb:v:47:y:2020:i:7:p:1167-1183. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.