IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/envirb/v46y2019i3p573-594.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Cultural impacts on nursing unit design: A comparative study on Chinese nursing unit typologies and their U.S. counterparts using space syntax

Author

Listed:
  • Hui Cai
  • Craig Zimring

Abstract

This study attempts to understand cultural impacts on nursing unit design through a comparative study on Chinese nursing unit typologies and their U.S. counterparts. The focus is to investigate whether seemingly westernized Chinese nursing units still retained certain characteristics of Chinese socio-cultural preferences; and how configurational differences of Chinese and American nursing unit design reflect the different work styles and organizational communication styles driven by national culture. This study’s contributions are twofold. Firstly, it demonstrates the impact of national culture on nursing unit design. The spatial configuration is a manifesto of culture and is congruent with culture. Secondly, from a methodological point of view, this study has translated abstract cultural schema, organizational constructs, and complex spatial relationships into quantitative spatial metrics. It makes the comparison of various building configurations from different cultures possible. The method and conceptual framework described here can be applied to understanding cultural differences in other building types as well.

Suggested Citation

  • Hui Cai & Craig Zimring, 2019. "Cultural impacts on nursing unit design: A comparative study on Chinese nursing unit typologies and their U.S. counterparts using space syntax," Environment and Planning B, , vol. 46(3), pages 573-594, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:envirb:v:46:y:2019:i:3:p:573-594
    DOI: 10.1177/2399808317715639
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/2399808317715639
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/2399808317715639?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:envirb:v:46:y:2019:i:3:p:573-594. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.