IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/envirb/v42y2015i4p688-707.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Visibility analysis in urban spaces: a raster-based approach and case studies

Author

Listed:
  • Gabriele Garnero
  • Enrico Fabrizio

Abstract

In this paper a method for the estimation of the visual impact of buildings with symbolic relevance, such as skyscrapers that are out of scale with their surrounding urban space, is discussed and applied. It is based on the viewshed analysis as developed in rural landscape studies, but it also takes into account the peculiarity emerging from the urban studies. In order to go beyond the sole information of whether a cell is, or is not, visible, which is typical of viewshed analyses, in this work the various factors that cause the visual attenuation with the distance are discussed and quantitatively assessed by determining various limit-of-visibility distances that may also be time variable. These factors are the visual acuity, the contrast between the target and its surroundings, the atmospheric visibility, and the recognition process of the subject. An application of this methodology is carried out on various case study buildings in the city of Turin, Italy (an ancient building, an urban landmark, the Mole, and a skyscraper under construction). From the visibility maps, under various conditions, it can be seen that the new skyscraper will be a major landmark not only for the entire city, but also for the surrounding municipalities.

Suggested Citation

  • Gabriele Garnero & Enrico Fabrizio, 2015. "Visibility analysis in urban spaces: a raster-based approach and case studies," Environment and Planning B, , vol. 42(4), pages 688-707, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:envirb:v:42:y:2015:i:4:p:688-707
    DOI: 10.1068/b130119p
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1068/b130119p
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1068/b130119p?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Dalit Shach-Pinsly & Dafna Fisher-Gewirtzman & Michael Burt, 2011. "Visual Exposure and Visual Openness: An Integrated Approach and Comparative Evaluation," Journal of Urban Design, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 16(2), pages 233-256, May.
    2. Torres-Sibille, Ana del Carmen & Cloquell-Ballester, Vicente-Agustín & Cloquell-Ballester, Víctor-Andrés & Artacho Ramírez, Miguel Ángel, 2009. "Aesthetic impact assessment of solar power plants: An objective and a subjective approach," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 13(5), pages 986-999, June.
    3. Chiabrando, Roberto & Fabrizio, Enrico & Garnero, Gabriele, 2011. "On the applicability of the visual impact assessment OAISPP tool to photovoltaic plants," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 15(1), pages 845-850, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ming Lu & Alin Lin & Jiyi Sun, 2018. "The Impact of Photovoltaic Applications on Urban Landscapes Based on Visual Q Methodology," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(4), pages 1-15, April.
    2. Salak, B. & Lindberg, K. & Kienast, F. & Hunziker, M., 2021. "How landscape-technology fit affects public evaluations of renewable energy infrastructure scenarios. A hybrid choice model," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 143(C).
    3. Núria Sánchez-Pantoja & Rosario Vidal & M. Carmen Pastor, 2021. "EU-Funded Projects with Actual Implementation of Renewable Energies in Cities. Analysis of Their Concern for Aesthetic Impact," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(6), pages 1-24, March.
    4. Scognamiglio, Alessandra, 2016. "‘Photovoltaic landscapes’: Design and assessment. A critical review for a new transdisciplinary design vision," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 55(C), pages 629-661.
    5. Sánchez-Pantoja, Núria & Vidal, Rosario & Pastor, M. Carmen, 2018. "Aesthetic impact of solar energy systems," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 98(C), pages 227-238.
    6. Irie, Noriko & Kawahara, Naoko, 2022. "Consumer preferences for local renewable electricity production in Japan: A choice experiment," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 182(C), pages 1171-1181.
    7. Spielhofer, R. & Thrash, T. & Hayek, U. Wissen & Grêt-Regamey, A. & Salak, B. & Grübel, J. & Schinazi, V.R., 2021. "Physiological and behavioral reactions to renewable energy systems in various landscape types," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 135(C).
    8. Kapetanakis, I.A. & Kolokotsa, D. & Maria, E.A., 2014. "Parametric analysis and assessment of the photovoltaics' landscape integration: Technical and legal aspects," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 67(C), pages 207-214.
    9. Zhou, Y. & Wilmink, D. & Zeman, M. & Isabella, O. & Ziar, H., 2023. "A geographic information system-based large scale visibility assessment tool for multi-criteria photovoltaic planning on urban building roofs," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 188(C).
    10. Oudes, D. & Stremke, S., 2021. "Next generation solar power plants? A comparative analysis of frontrunner solar landscapes in Europe," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 145(C).
    11. Anabela Botelho & Lina Sofia Lourenço-Gomes & Lígia Costa Pinto & Sara Sousa & Marieta Valente, 2016. "Accounting for local impacts of photovoltaic farms: two stated preferences approaches," NIMA Working Papers 64, Núcleo de Investigação em Microeconomia Aplicada (NIMA), Universidade do Minho.
    12. Suling Guo & Wei Sun & Wen Chen & Jianxin Zhang & Peixue Liu, 2021. "Impact of Artificial Elements on Mountain Landscape Perception: An Eye-Tracking Study," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(10), pages 1-18, October.
    13. Terrapon-Pfaff, Julia & Fink, Thomas & Viebahn, Peter & Jamea, El Mostafa, 2019. "Social impacts of large-scale solar thermal power plants: Assessment results for the NOORO I power plant in Morocco," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 113(C), pages 1-1.
    14. Fernandez-Jimenez, L. Alfredo & Mendoza-Villena, Montserrat & Zorzano-Santamaria, Pedro & Garcia-Garrido, Eduardo & Lara-Santillan, Pedro & Zorzano-Alba, Enrique & Falces, Alberto, 2015. "Site selection for new PV power plants based on their observability," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 78(C), pages 7-15.
    15. Alexandra Vrînceanu & Ines Grigorescu & Monica Dumitrașcu & Irena Mocanu & Cristina Dumitrică & Dana Micu & Gheorghe Kucsicsa & Bianca Mitrică, 2019. "Impacts of Photovoltaic Farms on the Environment in the Romanian Plain," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(13), pages 1-18, July.
    16. Sumper, Andreas & Boix-Aragonès, Oriol & Villafáfila-Robles, Roberto & Bergas-Jané, Joan & Ramírez-Pisco, Rodrigo, 2010. "Methodology for the assessment of the impact of existing high voltage lines in urban areas," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 38(10), pages 6036-6044, October.
    17. Frontuto, Vito & Corsi, Alessandro & Novelli, Silvia & Gullino, Paola & Larcher, Federica, 2020. "The visual impact of agricultural sheds on rural landscapes: The willingness to pay for mitigation solutions and treatment effects," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 91(C).
    18. Yannick Joye, 2011. "A Review of the Presence and Use of Fractal Geometry in Architectural Design," Environment and Planning B, , vol. 38(5), pages 814-828, October.
    19. Shr, Yau-Huo & Ready, Richard C. & Orland, Brian & Echols, Stuart, 2017. "Do Visual Representations Influence Survey Responses? Evidence from a Choice Experiment on Landscape Attributes of Green Infrastructure," 2017 Annual Meeting, July 30-August 1, Chicago, Illinois 258397, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
    20. Szabó, Sándor & Bódis, Katalin & Kougias, Ioannis & Moner-Girona, Magda & Jäger-Waldau, Arnulf & Barton, Gábor & Szabó, László, 2017. "A methodology for maximizing the benefits of solar landfills on closed sites," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 76(C), pages 1291-1300.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:envirb:v:42:y:2015:i:4:p:688-707. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.