IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/envirb/v38y2011i1p163-174.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Contractual Enforcement of Planning Conditions: A Hong Kong Case Study

Author

Listed:
  • Ping Yung

    (School of Architecture, Design and the Built Environment, Nottingham Trent University, Burton Street, Nottingham NG1 4BU, England)

Abstract

There is no direct statutory planning enforcement mechanism for land without a history of Interim Development Permission Area Plans or Development Permission Area Plans in Hong Kong. Indirect enforcement of planning conditions is largely conducted by the Buildings Department upon building approval and by the Lands Department if the conditions are incorporated into the lease. The extent to which planning conditions are incorporated into leases is largely unknown, impacting the effect of this indirect contractual enforcement. The extent and probabilities of the incorporation of planning conditions in Comprehensive Development Area zones into leases are investigated. A total of 339 planning conditions on thirty-eight sites were identified but some were excluded from the study, leaving 188 for analysis. These conditions were categorised into eight types and tested with a probit model. It was found that three categories of planning conditions (access improvement, footbridges, lay-bys, and public vehicle parks; social facilities such as open space, day nursery, or kindergarten; water supply, draining, sewage) had the highest percentages of incorporation into leases, while the percentage for a fourth category (layout, landscape, car park plan) was not very high but still significantly higher than the other four categories.

Suggested Citation

  • Ping Yung, 2011. "Contractual Enforcement of Planning Conditions: A Hong Kong Case Study," Environment and Planning B, , vol. 38(1), pages 163-174, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:envirb:v:38:y:2011:i:1:p:163-174
    DOI: 10.1068/b36098
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1068/b36098
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1068/b36098?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Lawrence W.C. Lai & S.K. Wong & Eric C.K. Ho & K.W. Chau, 2008. "Time Is Of The Essence? An Empirical Application Of The Corollary Of The Coase Theorem," Review of Urban & Regional Development Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 20(1), pages 34-51, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Lawrence Wai Chung Lai & Kelvin Siu Kei Wong & Kwong Wing Chau, 2011. "Are Engineering Reasons Zoning Neutral? An Empirical Inquiry into Development Proposals in Green Belt and Agriculture Zones," Environment and Planning B, , vol. 38(2), pages 322-337, April.
    2. Kwong, Jason W.Y. & Lai, Lawrence W.C. & Chau, K.W. & Chan, Vincent N.H., 2021. "A race between urban growth and regulation: An empirical case study on the layout plan," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 101(C).
    3. Lawrence W. C. Lai & Frank T. Lorne, 2019. "Sustainable Urban Renewal and Built Heritage Conservation in a Global Real Estate Revolution," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(3), pages 1-12, February.
    4. KW Chau & Lawrence WC Lai & Mark H Chua, 2022. "Post-colonial conservation of colonial built heritage in Hong Kong: A statistical analysis of historic building grading," Environment and Planning B, , vol. 49(2), pages 671-686, February.
    5. Lai, Lawrence W.C. & Ho, Daniel C.W. & Chau, K.W. & Yu, Esther Y.T. & Lam, Cindy L.K. & Leung, Nixon T.H. & Davies, Stephen N.G., 2021. "Property rights & the perceived health contribution of public open space in Hong Kong," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 107(C).

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:envirb:v:38:y:2011:i:1:p:163-174. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.