Author
Listed:
- Peter A Aspinall
(School of Built Environment, Heriot Watt University, Edinburgh EH14 4AS, Scotland)
- Catharine Ward Thompson
- Susana Alves
- Takemi Sugiyama
(Cancer Prevention Research Centre, School of Population Health, The University of Queensland, Herston, QLD 4006, Australia)
- Roger Brice
(7 Hough Lane, Wilmslow, Cheshire, SK9 2LG, England)
- Adrian Vickers
(Adelphi Group, Adelphi Mill, Grimshaw Lane, Bollington SK10 5JB, England)
Abstract
Having a neighbourhood open space that is attractive and easy to visit can benefit older people's well-being. However, to date little research has explored the comparative importance of different attributes of local open space for older adults. This study drew on a sample of people from across Britain, aged from 60 to 97 years, to address this gap. It used choice-based conjoint analysis of environmental attributes relevant to older people's park preferences to demonstrate the comparative importance of nuisances such as signs of vandalism or dog fouling, and deterrents such as heavy traffic en route to an open space, as well as the importance of attractors such as cafes and toilets, trees and plants, things to watch, and good maintenance. The results published here provide the basis for scenario modelling to predict the effects of changes to any attribute in terms of overall preference. Key subgroups in the sample were identified, their responses differing significantly according to whether or not they lived alone or had any mobility impairment. The value of the research lies in demonstrating the effectiveness of the methods: scenario modelling can take these different subgroups' preferences into account and such analysis can be of considerable practical value to open-space planners and designers.
Suggested Citation
Peter A Aspinall & Catharine Ward Thompson & Susana Alves & Takemi Sugiyama & Roger Brice & Adrian Vickers, 2010.
"Preference and Relative Importance for Environmental Attributes of Neighbourhood Open Space in Older People,"
Environment and Planning B, , vol. 37(6), pages 1022-1039, December.
Handle:
RePEc:sae:envirb:v:37:y:2010:i:6:p:1022-1039
DOI: 10.1068/b36024
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:envirb:v:37:y:2010:i:6:p:1022-1039. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.