IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/envirb/v35y2008i4p666-678.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Correspondences and Divergences between Teachers and Students in the Evaluation of Design Creativity in the Design Studio

Author

Listed:
  • Hernan Casakin

    (The Ariel University Center of Samaria, Department of Architecture, PO Box 3, Ariel 44837, Israel)

  • Shulamith Kreitler

    (Department of Psychology, Tel Aviv University, Ramat Aviv, Tel Aviv 69978, Israel)

Abstract

The assessment of design creativity is a fundamental issue in the educational curriculum in schools of architecture. Assessment in the form of criticism is carried out in the design studio, where students acquire skills and knowledge, forge judgments about their design outcomes, and get feedback from their instructors. This study focuses on the assessment of creativity in design problem solving. The major objective of this research was to test to what extent architects and design students share the same conceptions of creativity, and how similar they are. Contrasting differences were found between the two groups. While architects focused on innovation aspects, students paid more attention to operational aspects, such as dealing with design requirements. It is maintained that handling these differences by means of intervention programs in the design studio may promote the acquisition of design processes and procedures by the students, and also that, it will contribute to bridging the gap between the way teachers and students perceive and evaluate design creativity.

Suggested Citation

  • Hernan Casakin & Shulamith Kreitler, 2008. "Correspondences and Divergences between Teachers and Students in the Evaluation of Design Creativity in the Design Studio," Environment and Planning B, , vol. 35(4), pages 666-678, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:envirb:v:35:y:2008:i:4:p:666-678
    DOI: 10.1068/b3405
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1068/b3405
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1068/b3405?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:envirb:v:35:y:2008:i:4:p:666-678. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.