IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/envirb/v35y2008i2p337-348.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Statistical Examination of Visual Depth in Building Elevations

Author

Listed:
  • Andrew Crompton
  • Frank Brown

Abstract

Old buildings may be easier to read than modern buildings because they possess visual depth. This is the finding of an experiment that analysed building elevations and newspapers looking for a connection between their character and the size – frequency distribution of their component parts. It was found that drawings of older buildings sometimes displayed 1/ f scaling and thus resembled natural scenes, but that this was rarely the case for modern buildings. The same distribution was also found in newspaper pages. We hypothesise that this distribution allows buildings to appear interesting and changeful when approached from afar in the same way that it makes newspapers easy to read over a range of distances, on a newsstand, over a shoulder, and so forth.

Suggested Citation

  • Andrew Crompton & Frank Brown, 2008. "A Statistical Examination of Visual Depth in Building Elevations," Environment and Planning B, , vol. 35(2), pages 337-348, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:envirb:v:35:y:2008:i:2:p:337-348
    DOI: 10.1068/b33084
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1068/b33084
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1068/b33084?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:envirb:v:35:y:2008:i:2:p:337-348. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.