IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/envirb/v34y2007i5p785-807.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Making the Political Landscape Visible: Mapping and Analyzing Voting Patterns in an Ideological Space

Author

Listed:
  • Heinrich Leuthold
  • Michael Hermann
  • Sara Irina Fabrikant

Abstract

This paper investigates the applicability of knowledge domain mapping for analyzing political science data. Utilizing metaphorical-space models grounded on political science theory, and applying sound cartographic visualization techniques, we demonstrate the construction and analysis of knowledge domain maps for exploring voting behaviour in Switzerland. We digitally transformed the results of Swiss popular referenda of the last twenty years to generate a 3-dimensional semantic space representing the current political landscape of Switzerland. The whole country is depicted in this semantic political space at various spatial scales. Locations in this spatialization represent aggregated voting outcomes from cities, regions, and provinces. Special attention was given to the interpretation of the resulting spatial configuration. This includes the assignment of meaning to the axes of the 3D space, depicted in two dimensions. Armed with political science theory locations in the voting behaviour space can be analyzed and the resulting political pattern can be interpreted meaningfully. The spatialized views were disseminated to the public after recent Swiss elections. The initial feedback from domain specialists and decision-makers alike has been very encouraging. Measured by high number of substantive reactions and wide-spread feedback on these spatializations of voting behaviour one could deduce that these abstract views were readily accepted and understood by public administrators, political party leaders, and the politically interested public. Based on these experiences we conclude the paper with a first attempt at identifying design recommendation for spatializing multidimensional political datasets.

Suggested Citation

  • Heinrich Leuthold & Michael Hermann & Sara Irina Fabrikant, 2007. "Making the Political Landscape Visible: Mapping and Analyzing Voting Patterns in an Ideological Space," Environment and Planning B, , vol. 34(5), pages 785-807, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:envirb:v:34:y:2007:i:5:p:785-807
    DOI: 10.1068/b3304t
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1068/b3304t
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1068/b3304t?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Miller McPherson, 2004. "A Blau space primer: prolegomenon to an ecology of affiliation," Industrial and Corporate Change, Oxford University Press and the Associazione ICC, vol. 13(1), pages 263-280, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Hernan Mondani, 2018. "The underlying geometry of organizational dynamics: similarity-based social space and labor flow network communities," Computational and Mathematical Organization Theory, Springer, vol. 24(3), pages 378-400, September.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Junyi Gao & Joerg Heintz & Christina Mack & Lucas Glass & Adam Cross & Jimeng Sun, 2023. "Evidence-driven spatiotemporal COVID-19 hospitalization prediction with Ising dynamics," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 14(1), pages 1-14, December.
    2. Yuan Hsiao, 2022. "Network diffusion of competing behaviors," Journal of Computational Social Science, Springer, vol. 5(1), pages 47-68, May.
    3. Balázs Kovács & Glenn R. Carroll, 2010. "Niche width and scale in organizational competition: A computational approach," Computational and Mathematical Organization Theory, Springer, vol. 16(1), pages 29-60, March.
    4. Jiaqi Ge & Andrea Scalco & Tony Craig, 2022. "Social Influence and Meat-Eating Behaviour," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(13), pages 1-23, June.
    5. Hernan Mondani, 2018. "The underlying geometry of organizational dynamics: similarity-based social space and labor flow network communities," Computational and Mathematical Organization Theory, Springer, vol. 24(3), pages 378-400, September.
    6. Renato Corbetta, 2015. "Between indifference and coercion: Third-party intervention techniques in ongoing disputes," Conflict Management and Peace Science, Peace Science Society (International), vol. 32(1), pages 3-27, February.
    7. César García-Díaz & Gábor Péli & Arjen van Witteloostuijn, 2020. "The coevolution of the firm and the product attribute space," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(6), pages 1-25, June.
    8. Nicolas L. Harder & Matthew E. Brashears, 2020. "Predicting organizational recruitment using a hybrid cellular model: new directions in Blau space analysis," Computational and Mathematical Organization Theory, Springer, vol. 26(3), pages 320-349, September.
    9. Jeffrey A. Smith & Jessica Burow, 2020. "Using Ego Network Data to Inform Agent-based Models of Diffusion," Sociological Methods & Research, , vol. 49(4), pages 1018-1063, November.
    10. Candiani, Juan Antonio & Gilsing, Victor & Mastrogiorgio, Mariano, 2022. "Technological entry in new niches: Diversity, crowding and generalism," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 116(C).
    11. Christine A. Bachrach & S. Philip Morgan, 2013. "A Cognitive–Social Model of Fertility Intentions," Population and Development Review, The Population Council, Inc., vol. 39(3), pages 459-485, September.
    12. Ad van den Oord & Arjen van Witteloostuijn, 2017. "The Population Ecology of Technology: An Empirical Study of US Biotechnology Patents from 1976 to 2003," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 12(1), pages 1-26, January.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:envirb:v:34:y:2007:i:5:p:785-807. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.