Author
Listed:
- Mahbub Rashid
(Department of Design, University of Kansas, 1467 Jayhawk Boulevard, Room 300, Lawrence, Kansas 66045, USA)
- Kevin Kampschroer
(Public Buildings Service, US General Services Administration, 1800 F Street, NW, Washington, DC 20405-0002, USA)
- Jean Wineman
(Taubman College of Architecture and Urban Planning, University of Michigan, Room 2150, 2000 Bonisteel Boulevard, Ann Arbor, MI 48109-2069, USA)
- Craig Zimring
(College of Architecture, Georgia Institute of Technology, 245 Fourth Street, Atlanta, GA 30332-155, USA)
Abstract
In this paper we report a study that uses space-syntax theories and techniques to develop a model explaining how spatial layouts, through their effects on movement and visible copresence, may affect face-to-face interaction in offices. Though several previous space-syntax studies have shown that spatial layouts have significant effects on movement and face-to-face interaction in offices, none has investigated the relations among movement, visible copresence, and face-to-face interaction in offices with significantly different layouts. On the basis of statistical analyses of the spatial and behavioral data collected at four moderately large offices, this study shows that spatial layouts have consistent effects on movement, but inconsistent effects on visible copresence and face-to-face interaction; that visible copresence, not movement, is an important predictor of face-to-face interaction; that movement has negligible effects on the relationship between visible copresence and face-to-face interaction; and that functional programs have little or no effect on the culture of face-to-face interaction in these offices. Limitations of the research design for workplace study and implications of the research findings for workplace design and management are discussed.
Suggested Citation
Mahbub Rashid & Kevin Kampschroer & Jean Wineman & Craig Zimring, 2006.
"Spatial Layout and Face-to-Face Interaction in Offices—A Study of the Mechanisms of Spatial Effects on Face-to-Face Interaction,"
Environment and Planning B, , vol. 33(6), pages 825-844, December.
Handle:
RePEc:sae:envirb:v:33:y:2006:i:6:p:825-844
DOI: 10.1068/b31123
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:envirb:v:33:y:2006:i:6:p:825-844. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.