IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/envirb/v30y2003i4p575-587.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A 3-D Visual Method for Comparative Evaluation of Dense Built-up Environments

Author

Listed:
  • Dafna Fisher-Gewirtzman
  • Michael Burt
  • Yigal Tzamir

Abstract

The work reported here is a contribution by the authors to the search for reliable metric method for spatial evaluation, related to human perception of ‘openness’ and to the development of evaluation tools for urban planning and design. A recent innovation, the ‘spatial openness index’ (SOI), a quantitative index, based on a three-dimensional visual analysis of space is applied here. This approach reflects the hierarchical order found in the urban environment: dwelling unit, building, neighbourhood, etc. This index expresses oppenness to natural light, air, and near and distant views, for each level in the hierarchical order. At the basis of this work is the assumption that the SOI is correlated with the ‘perceived density’, evaluated by people responding to alternative spatial configurations. A preliminary indication test was carried out in order to justify this assumption. In this test, groups of spatial configurations with equal built masses were ranked both by their calculated SOI and by statistical analysis of perceived density evaluated by participating individuals. Good agreement was found between pairs of results obtained for most of the spatial configurations.

Suggested Citation

  • Dafna Fisher-Gewirtzman & Michael Burt & Yigal Tzamir, 2003. "A 3-D Visual Method for Comparative Evaluation of Dense Built-up Environments," Environment and Planning B, , vol. 30(4), pages 575-587, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:envirb:v:30:y:2003:i:4:p:575-587
    DOI: 10.1068/b2941
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1068/b2941
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1068/b2941?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:envirb:v:30:y:2003:i:4:p:575-587. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.