IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/envirb/v22y1995i2p175-190.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Expert Support for Problem Formulation in Urban Planning

Author

Listed:
  • R V George

    (Department of Urban and Regional Planning, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, 907 1/2 West Nevada, Urbana, IL 61801, USA)

Abstract

The situations that constitute urban planning problems are extremely complex, and the formulation of these problems is usually an intractable task. As a procedurally rational response to this intractability, scholars and practitioners have prescribed tools, such as the function analysis system technique (FAST) diagram, for systematically formulating complex problems. To make the FAST diagram more accessible to novices and more easily used by experts, SmartDRAW, a computer-based tool that provides expert support for creating FAST diagrams of problematic situations, has been developed. In this paper, first, the FAST diagram is described, and the reasons why it is suited to formulating complex problems is discussed. Then, the way in which SmartDRAW provides expert support in constructing FAST diagrams is described. Finally, a brief evaluation of the extent to which SmartDRAW improves problem formulation is given.

Suggested Citation

  • R V George, 1995. "Expert Support for Problem Formulation in Urban Planning," Environment and Planning B, , vol. 22(2), pages 175-190, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:envirb:v:22:y:1995:i:2:p:175-190
    DOI: 10.1068/b220175
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1068/b220175
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1068/b220175?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. William N. Dunn, 1988. "Methods Of The Second Type: Coping With The Wilderness Of Conventional Policy Analysis," Review of Policy Research, Policy Studies Organization, vol. 7(4), pages 720-737, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Setiawan, Andri D. & Cuppen, Eefje, 2013. "Stakeholder perspectives on carbon capture and storage in Indonesia," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 61(C), pages 1188-1199.
    2. Dan Durning, 1993. "Participatory policy analysis in a social service agency: A case study," Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 12(2), pages 297-322.
    3. Marleen Kerkhof, 2006. "Making a difference: On the constraints of consensus building and the relevance of deliberation in stakeholder dialogues," Policy Sciences, Springer;Society of Policy Sciences, vol. 39(3), pages 279-299, September.
    4. Anthony Perl & Michael Howlett & M. Ramesh, 2018. "Policy-making and truthiness: Can existing policy models cope with politicized evidence and willful ignorance in a “post-fact” world?," Policy Sciences, Springer;Society of Policy Sciences, vol. 51(4), pages 581-600, December.
    5. Eefje Cuppen, 2012. "Diversity and constructive conflict in stakeholder dialogue: considerations for design and methods," Policy Sciences, Springer;Society of Policy Sciences, vol. 45(1), pages 23-46, March.
    6. Ion Georgiou & Joaquim Heck, 2021. "The emergence of problem structuring methods, 1950s–1989: An atlas of the journal literature," Systems Research and Behavioral Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 38(6), pages 756-796, November.
    7. Michel J.G. van Eeten, 2001. "Recasting Intractable Policy Issues: The Wider Implications of The Netherlands Civil Aviation Controversy," Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 20(3), pages 391-414.
    8. Geurts, Jac. L. A. & Joldersma, Cisca, 2001. "Methodology for participatory policy analysis," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 128(2), pages 300-310, January.
    9. Cuppen, Eefje & Breukers, Sylvia & Hisschemöller, Matthijs & Bergsma, Emmy, 2010. "Q methodology to select participants for a stakeholder dialogue on energy options from biomass in the Netherlands," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 69(3), pages 579-591, January.
    10. Klara Pigmans & Huib Aldewereld & Virginia Dignum & Neelke Doorn, 2019. "The Role of Value Deliberation to Improve Stakeholder Participation in Issues of Water Governance," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 33(12), pages 4067-4085, September.
    11. Mikael Klintman, 2009. "Participation in Green Consumer Policies: Deliberative Democracy under Wrong Conditions?," Journal of Consumer Policy, Springer, vol. 32(1), pages 43-57, March.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:envirb:v:22:y:1995:i:2:p:175-190. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.