Author
Listed:
- A B Yaakup
(Department of Urban and Regional Planning, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, Sekudai, Johor, Malaysia)
- R G Healey
(Regional Research Laboratory, Scotland, Department of Geography, University of Edinburgh, Drummond Street, Edinburgh EH8 9XP, Scotland)
Abstract
The most pressing problems of rapid urbanisation in Kuala Lumpur include the need for land, housing, and provision of services. The link with day-to-day planning problems, however, remains a critical problem. The quality of the planning and decisionmaking process can be substantially improved when valid data are appropriately and efficiently handled. The aim of this paper is to demonstrate the use of geographic information systems (GISs) in evaluating alternative solutions to squatter problems. After the initial development of the GIS database, it has been used to produce various scenarios which take into account the socioeconomic characteristics of the squatters, the constraints of the physical layout of existing squatter settlements, availability of land, and site suitability of different kinds of development. Spatial modelling techniques are employed to examine alternative plans for the squatter areas. These plans are evaluated by means of cost-benefit analysis incorporated into the GIS database. The authors also discuss the development of an interactive graphic user-interface to the GIS for squatter planning and management. This is intended to facilitate user access to squatter-planning scenarios. The interface provides flexibility in data selection and display, to allow physical planners and decisionmakers to view and analyse the planning scenarios interactively before deciding on the final plan. In a concluding section some of the problems encountered are highlighted and factors which need to be considered if GIS is to be employed in this type of exercise are indicated.
Suggested Citation
A B Yaakup & R G Healey, 1994.
"A GIS Approach to Spatial Modelling for Squatter Settlement Planning in Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia,"
Environment and Planning B, , vol. 21(1), pages 21-34, February.
Handle:
RePEc:sae:envirb:v:21:y:1994:i:1:p:21-34
DOI: 10.1068/b210021
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:envirb:v:21:y:1994:i:1:p:21-34. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.