Author
Abstract
During the last two decades attention to location-dependent information has greatly increased. Process planning and decisionmaking require the availability of relevant data and proper information to monitor development processes, to prepare alternative plans, and to analyse impacts. It has become clear that planners and politicians as well as decisionmakers do need a new way of presentation of information. The information required should be delivered not only quickly and efficiently, but also on thematic maps instead of as a pile of paperwork. The crucial element here is the spatial dimension, which must be the integrative basis of a relevant information system. After the introduction of the segment method as a basis for spatially oriented information systems it was used haphazardly in many countries in the nineteen seventies, particularly at national level. In the nineteen eighties these systems were also used for maintenance and control purposes at local level. In the Netherlands we are at the eve of the takeoff of nationally uniform applications of spatially oriented information systems at the local level. In this paper the political and administrative boundaries of the situation in the Netherlands is sketched. Although there is pressure for innovation it has taken a long time for a breakthrough, with a feasibility study in 1982 being followed by a cost-effectiveness study in 1983. In three different types of cities eight applications were made, in consultation with representatives of the local authorities of the municipalities concerned. In this paper the cases are described in outline with an emphasis on data processing, cartographic results, and cost-benefits. An outline of the planned activities for 1984 and 1985 in the Netherlands is then presented. It enables us to answer the question of who must be convinced to get spatially oriented information systems in operation: politicians or planners.
Suggested Citation
J van Est & F de Vroege, 1985.
"Spatially Oriented Information Systems for Planning and Decisionmaking in the Netherlands,"
Environment and Planning B, , vol. 12(3), pages 251-267, September.
Handle:
RePEc:sae:envirb:v:12:y:1985:i:3:p:251-267
DOI: 10.1068/b120251
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:envirb:v:12:y:1985:i:3:p:251-267. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.