IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/envira/v9y1977i7p759-769.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Comparative Analysis of Spatial Representation in Doubly Constrained Interaction Models

Author

Listed:
  • I Masser

    (Instituut voor Planologie, Rijksuniversiteit Utrecht, Heidelberglaan 2, Utrecht 2506, The Netherlands)

Abstract

Some simple criteria for comparing the spatial systems that are used in different applications of doubly constrained interaction models are described and their usefulness is demonstrated by a comparative analysis of four models drawn from British, Dutch, and German sources. The influence that spatial representation has on the performance of the models is also examined and considerable differences are found between the four case studies. These effect the separate interpretability of the endogenously predicted variables and the rate at which the convergence criteria are satisfied.

Suggested Citation

  • I Masser, 1977. "A Comparative Analysis of Spatial Representation in Doubly Constrained Interaction Models," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 9(7), pages 759-769, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:envira:v:9:y:1977:i:7:p:759-769
    DOI: 10.1068/a090759
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1068/a090759
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1068/a090759?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:envira:v:9:y:1977:i:7:p:759-769. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.