IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/envira/v56y2024i1p136-154.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

From coca to cocoa: Conflicts, violence and hegemonic compromises in the turbulent Peruvian Amazonia settlement process: The case of Tocache

Author

Listed:
  • Daniel Coq-Huelva

    (Departamento de Economía Aplicada II, Instituto de Estudios sobre América Latina, Universidad de Sevilla, Sevilla, Spain)

  • Angie Higuchi

    (Department of Business Administration, Universidad del Pacífico, Lima, Perú)

  • Ruth Arias-Gutiérrez

    (Universidad Estatal Amazónica, Puyo, Ecuador)

  • Rafaela Alfalla-Luque

    (Departamento de Dirección Financiera y Operaciones, Facultad de Turismo y Finanzas, Universidad de Sevilla, Sevilla, Spain)

Abstract

This article analyses the role of conventions, compromises and even violence in the intricate bio-social construction process of cocoa cultivation in the province of Tocache in the Peruvian Amazonia. This article discusses the different phases of the settlement process and its social, institutional and environmental bases. Specifically, the analysis focuses on the dramatic abandonment of coca cultivation and its replacement by alternative crops such as cocoa. Emphasis is placed on the centrality of agents’ normative coherence and coordination. For over 50 years, the civic–market compromise has framed agents’ discourses and actions, although it has sometimes been ostensibly distorted. This framing effect has also occurred in circumstances with considerable recourse to violence and armed conflict. Thus, this article focuses not only on justification processes but also on what happens ‘after justification’ and on how violent situations can coexist with discursive constructions with a relevant normative element.

Suggested Citation

  • Daniel Coq-Huelva & Angie Higuchi & Ruth Arias-Gutiérrez & Rafaela Alfalla-Luque, 2024. "From coca to cocoa: Conflicts, violence and hegemonic compromises in the turbulent Peruvian Amazonia settlement process: The case of Tocache," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 56(1), pages 136-154, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:envira:v:56:y:2024:i:1:p:136-154
    DOI: 10.1177/0308518X231189569
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0308518X231189569
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/0308518X231189569?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:envira:v:56:y:2024:i:1:p:136-154. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.