IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/envira/v54y2022i2p405-412.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

“Writing's intimate spatialities: Drawing ourselves to our writing in self-caring practices of loveâ€

Author

Listed:
  • Dydia DeLyser

Abstract

This Commentary outlines four conceptual-spatial challenges of academic writing, and suggests an approach to navigating them. Academic writing, as feminist economic geographers argue, is underpinned by difference: emerging from and produced through different positionalities, differing access to stable employment and material, temporal and spatial resources, all set within structures of power and inequity—significant among them the neoliberal university. At the same time, for academics writing demands space in our lives: temporally, locationally, conceptually, and emotionally. Because these spatialities are potentially different for each writer each time we write and because they engage us spatially at a personal level, I term them writing's intimate spatialities, and suggest that care-fully navigating these conceptual-spatial challenges of academic writing stakes out a political position, one that may now be more important than ever: In an academic environment of neoliberalism and increasing precarity, I suggest that writing's prevalent emotional apprehensions may be able to be affirmatively conceptualized as a labor of self-care we come to with love.

Suggested Citation

  • Dydia DeLyser, 2022. "“Writing's intimate spatialities: Drawing ourselves to our writing in self-caring practices of loveâ€," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 54(2), pages 405-412, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:envira:v:54:y:2022:i:2:p:405-412
    DOI: 10.1177/0308518X211068496
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0308518X211068496
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/0308518X211068496?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Chris Gibson & Lesley Head & Chantel Carr, 2015. "From Incremental Change to Radical Disjuncture: Rethinking Everyday Household Sustainability Practices as Survival Skills," Annals of the American Association of Geographers, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 105(2), pages 416-424, March.
    2. Dydia DeLyser & Paul Greenstein, 2017. "The Devotions of Restoration: Materiality, Enthusiasm, and Making Three “Indian Motocycles” Like New," Annals of the American Association of Geographers, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 107(6), pages 1461-1478, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. D. Liliana González-Hernández & Raúl A. Aguirre-Gamboa & Erik W. Meijles, 2023. "The role of climate change perceptions and sociodemographics on reported mitigation efforts and performance among households in northeastern Mexico," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 25(2), pages 1853-1875, February.
    2. Sarah-Louise Ruder & Sophia Rose Sanniti, 2019. "Transcending the Learned Ignorance of Predatory Ontologies: A Research Agenda for an Ecofeminist-Informed Ecological Economics," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(5), pages 1-29, March.
    3. Stephanie Toole & Natascha Klocker & Lesley Head, 2016. "Re-thinking climate change adaptation and capacities at the household scale," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 135(2), pages 203-209, March.
    4. Ronlyn Duncan & Melissa Robson-Williams & Graeme Nicholas & James A. Turner & Rawiri Smith & David Diprose, 2018. "Transformation Is ‘Experienced, Not Delivered’: Insights from Grounding the Discourse in Practice to Inform Policy and Theory," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(9), pages 1-20, September.
    5. Zofia Patora-Wysocka & Łukasz Sułkowski, 2019. "Sustainable Incremental Organizational Change—A Case of the Textile and Apparel Industry," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(4), pages 1-27, February.
    6. Stephanie Toole & Natascha Klocker & Lesley Head, 2016. "Re-thinking climate change adaptation and capacities at the household scale," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 135(2), pages 203-209, March.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:envira:v:54:y:2022:i:2:p:405-412. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.