IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/envira/v47y2015i1p156-171.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

At the Mercy of the Mountain? Field Stations and the Culture of Volcanology

Author

Listed:
  • Amy Donovan
  • Clive Oppenheimer

Abstract

This paper discusses the role of volcano observatories as local sites of knowledge production through the monitoring of volcanoes, and links this with the global production of knowledge in volcanology. The paper initially discusses the institutional geography of volcanological science, and relates this broadly to the geography of science and science studies. It then focuses on interview data to draw some insights into the experiences of observatory and university scientists. Observatories have to provide scientific advice to local authorities and also engage with the international scientific community. They may act as gatekeepers to the field, and as rich sources of baseline data for research projects. As such, they have a pivotal role in the production of knowledge beyond the field sites—and are also involved in the protection of populations. The paper argues that the tension between academic research and volcano monitoring that occurs at many observatories is an important part of the process of knowledge production in volcanology, and also reveals the complex geographies of social responsibility and collaboration that exist around active volcanoes as scientific networks and territorial governance structures interact.

Suggested Citation

  • Amy Donovan & Clive Oppenheimer, 2015. "At the Mercy of the Mountain? Field Stations and the Culture of Volcanology," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 47(1), pages 156-171, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:envira:v:47:y:2015:i:1:p:156-171
    DOI: 10.1068/a130161p
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1068/a130161p
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1068/a130161p?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:envira:v:47:y:2015:i:1:p:156-171. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.