IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/envira/v46y2014i11p2585-2603.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Kapoorian Geographies of Relationality: The Baroque, Topological Twists, Phase Space in Action

Author

Listed:
  • Martin Jones

    (Department of Geography, and White Rose Social Sciences DTC, The University of Sheffield, Winter Street, Sheffield S10 2TN, England)

Abstract

The Baroque offers architectures of vision that situate the viewer in a distinctly spatial relationship to the representation. Rather than providing a statically ordered perspectival arrangement, the ‘center’ continually shifts, the result being the ongoing articulation of complex spatial conditions where the subject is coextensive with that of the observer. This paper develops a ‘Baroque sensibility’ by offering a geographical perspective on the work of Anish Kapoor—one of the most celebrated and definitional artists of our time, and an expander of the notion of public art—and linking this to ongoing debates on spatializations in human geography. The paper suggests that Kapoor's work of ‘moving narratives’ and ‘processional methods of viewing’ is an example of ‘phase space’ in action—a critique and extension of ‘thinking space relationally’ in human geography. Focusing specifically on Kapoor's 2008 Memory , a commission for the Deutsche Guggenheim, which travelled to New York in 2009, it deploys a Kapoorian geography of the polycentric logic to illustrate this. From the experience of Memory , the paper then discusses two interrelated conceptual perspectives, fractal spatiality and plasticity, to take the human geographies of relationality forward.

Suggested Citation

  • Martin Jones, 2014. "Kapoorian Geographies of Relationality: The Baroque, Topological Twists, Phase Space in Action," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 46(11), pages 2585-2603, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:envira:v:46:y:2014:i:11:p:2585-2603
    DOI: 10.1068/a46180
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1068/a46180
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1068/a46180?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Martin Jones & Anssi Paasi, 2013. "Guest Editorial: Regional World(s): Advancing the Geography of Regions," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 47(1), pages 1-5, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Mark He & Joseph Glasser & Nathaniel Pritchard & Shankar Bhamidi & Nikhil Kaza, 2020. "Demarcating geographic regions using community detection in commuting networks with significant self-loops," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(4), pages 1-31, April.
    2. John Harrison & Anna Growe, 2014. "When Regions Collide: In What Sense a New ‘Regional Problem’?," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 46(10), pages 2332-2352, October.
    3. Leah Koskimaki & Carol Upadhya, 2017. "Introduction: Reconsidering the Region in India," Journal of South Asian Development, , vol. 12(2), pages 89-111, August.
    4. Sanderien Verstappen, 2017. "Mobility and the Region," Journal of South Asian Development, , vol. 12(2), pages 112-135, August.
    5. Christopher S Fowler & Leif Jensen, 2020. "Bridging the gap between geographic concept and the data we have: The case of labor markets in the USA," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 52(7), pages 1395-1414, October.
    6. Paul Waley, 2016. "Speaking gentrification in the languages of the Global East," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 53(3), pages 615-625, February.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:envira:v:46:y:2014:i:11:p:2585-2603. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.