Author
Listed:
- Carl Lavery
(Theatre, Film and Television, College of Arts, University of Glasgow, Gilmorehill Halls, 9 University Avenue, Glasgow G12 8QQ, Scotland)
- Deborah P Dixon
(School of Geographical and Earth Sciences, University of Glasgow, East Quadrangle, University Avenue, Glasgow G12 8QQ, Scotland)
- Lee Hassall
(Fine Art, Art and Science Building, University of Lincoln, Brayford Pool, Lincoln LN6 7TS, England)
Abstract
Here, we present an iteration of our theoretical/creative writing project Hashima , begun in 2012. The paper is a collaboration and draws on the different discourses, practices and sensibilities of a performance theorist, a geographer, and a visual artist. For us, Hashima, located off the coast of Nagasaki, Japan, and a former site of forced labor and intensive offshore coal-mining, is a provocation for experimentation. Hashima, exploited and abject, has offered itself, unsurprisingly, to the fetishistic gaze of artists, photographers urban explorers, and ruin enthusiasts. The logic here is to control representation, and to determine and fix the meaning of the island as always in reference to something else and elsewhere. Paradoxically, there is no sense of temporality or transformation in these representations of ruins; time has been stopped in an image. By contrast, we want to draw out the allegorical value of Hashima not as a site of loss, but as a baroque, blasted landscape of monstrous becomings that resists, and forefronts, this tendency to collapse history into nature. In the following, we introduce the island before turning to an exegesis of Walter Benjamin's writing on German baroque tragedy in order to demonstrate how representation itself becomes tainted through a material encounter with the baroque's two primary topoi , the ruin and the labyrinth. To do this, we finish with a creative narrative and two images illustrating our methodology.
Suggested Citation
Carl Lavery & Deborah P Dixon & Lee Hassall, 2014.
"The Future of Ruins: The Baroque Melancholy of Hashima,"
Environment and Planning A, , vol. 46(11), pages 2569-2584, November.
Handle:
RePEc:sae:envira:v:46:y:2014:i:11:p:2569-2584
DOI: 10.1068/a46179
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:envira:v:46:y:2014:i:11:p:2569-2584. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.