IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/envira/v44y2012i8p2006-2022.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Projected Futures: The Political Matter of UK Higher Activity Radioactive Waste

Author

Listed:
  • Nicky Gregson

    (Department of Geography, Durham University, Science Laboratories, South Road, Durham DH1 3LE, England)

Abstract

This paper identifies, and works from, the technoconceptual as a site of intervention for a politics of stuff. Its case is radioactive waste: specifically, UK higher activity wastes (HAW) and the policy future of a UK Deep Geological Disposal Facility (DGF). The paper proceeds through three steps. It charts, first, the unravelling of HAW as onto-politics through the democratisation of technoscience, showing that, as the gap between stuff and politics has opened, HAW's future in a DGF has become the preserve of science—technical discourses (currently geology and engineered design). Secondly, it joins with the undone-science traditions of STS (science, technology, and society), to critique existing technoscientific conceptualisations of a DGF and to anticipate a future in which a DGF is abandoned. Third, and in response to abandonment, it proposes a different future for a DGF. This starts from thinking radioactive waste as ‘thing power’ but argues that, for a DGF to be materialised in ways that forge attachments with publics, requires a turn to material culture. More broadly, the paper argues that furthering ontopolitics requires keeping the demos alive to stuff's vitality. This means engaging in political settlements of technoscientific controversies; with old, or established, technologies, and ‘cold’ politics; and in politics as practised.

Suggested Citation

  • Nicky Gregson, 2012. "Projected Futures: The Political Matter of UK Higher Activity Radioactive Waste," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 44(8), pages 2006-2022, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:envira:v:44:y:2012:i:8:p:2006-2022
    DOI: 10.1068/a44600
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1068/a44600
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1068/a44600?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Mark Elam & Göran Sundqvist, 2009. "The Swedish KBS project: a last word in nuclear fuel safety prepares to conquer the world?," Journal of Risk Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 12(7-8), pages 969-988, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Antoienette Wärnbäck & Linda Soneryd & Tuija Hilding-Rydevik, 2013. "Shared Practice and Converging Views in Nuclear Waste Management: Long-Term Relations between Implementer and Regulator in Sweden," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 45(9), pages 2212-2226, September.
    2. Catherine Mei Ling Wong, 2015. "The Mutable Nature of Risk and Acceptability: A Hybrid Risk Governance Framework," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 35(11), pages 1969-1982, November.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:envira:v:44:y:2012:i:8:p:2006-2022. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.