IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/envira/v42y2010i1p116-133.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

In Pursuit of Parrhesia: An Investigation into Knowledge Selection in Inquisitorial Planning Practice

Author

Listed:
  • Stephen McKay

    (School of Planning, Architecture and Civil Engineering, Queen's University Belfast, Level 3, David Keir Building, Stranmillis Road, Belfast BT9 SAG, Northern Ireland)

Abstract

Drawing upon interviews with procedural actants from Public Inquiry and Examination in Public fora, I draw upon relevant theoretical frameworks to evaluate modes of discourse in inquisitorial planning practice. In the investigation, which is based primarily upon an empirical study, I focus upon the role of evidence, the selection and handling of multiple knowledges, the behaviour of participants, and the methodology underpinning the process. It is established that such arenas can be effective mechanisms for testing complex evidence; and suggestions are made for improved practice, procedure, and future research. I conclude by raising serious ethical questions concerning participant behaviour, particularly on the part of advocates and especially chartered town planners.

Suggested Citation

  • Stephen McKay, 2010. "In Pursuit of Parrhesia: An Investigation into Knowledge Selection in Inquisitorial Planning Practice," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 42(1), pages 116-133, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:envira:v:42:y:2010:i:1:p:116-133
    DOI: 10.1068/a42117
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1068/a42117
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1068/a42117?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:envira:v:42:y:2010:i:1:p:116-133. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.