IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/envira/v39y2007i6p1497-1512.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Impact of Abolishing Social-Housing Grants on the Compact-City Policy of Dutch Municipalities

Author

Listed:
  • Willem K Korthals Altes

    (OTB Research Institute for Housing, Urban and Mobility Studies, PO Box 5030, NL-2600 GA Delft, The Netherlands)

Abstract

Building on previously developed land is a top priority in Dutch compact-city policies. During the 1980s government grants supported building on these locations. In 1990 nonsubsidised housing accounted for only 5% of the housing programme for these inner-city sites. In 1995, as a result of the transformation of the welfare state in the Netherlands, the government abolished grants for the construction of social housing. This had a massive impact on the housing programme; and subsidies, as a proportion of the cost of infrastructure provision, dropped from 68% in 1990 to 30% in 2000. These changes have had a major impact on the role of municipalities and the powers they need to provide new housing on previously developed land. The municipalities' lack of powers and the new market conditions are contributing to the present stagnation of housebuilding in the Netherlands, and both of these factors influence Dutch compact-city policy.

Suggested Citation

  • Willem K Korthals Altes, 2007. "The Impact of Abolishing Social-Housing Grants on the Compact-City Policy of Dutch Municipalities," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 39(6), pages 1497-1512, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:envira:v:39:y:2007:i:6:p:1497-1512
    DOI: 10.1068/a38281
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1068/a38281
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1068/a38281?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Frans M. Dieleman & Christiaan Wallet, 2003. "Income differences between central cities and suburbs in Dutch urban regions," Tijdschrift voor Economische en Sociale Geografie, Royal Dutch Geographical Society KNAG, vol. 94(2), pages 265-275, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Hans R.A. Koster & Jan Rouwendal, 2012. "The Impact Of Mixed Land Use On Residential Property Values," Journal of Regional Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 52(5), pages 733-761, December.
    2. Evelien Van Rij & Eric Koomen, 2010. "Analysing The Rural Vitality Argument For Residential Development: Linking Discourses And Actual Spatial Developments," Tijdschrift voor Economische en Sociale Geografie, Royal Dutch Geographical Society KNAG, vol. 101(5), pages 583-595, December.
    3. Janssen-Jansen Leonie, 2016. "Taking national planning seriously: A challenged planning agenda in the Netherlands," Administration, Sciendo, vol. 64(3-4), pages 23-43, December.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Tom Kauko, 2005. "Using the Self-Organising Map to Identify Regularities across Country-Specific Housing-Market Contexts," Environment and Planning B, , vol. 32(1), pages 89-110, February.
    2. Cheng Boon Ong, 2017. "Tipping points in Dutch big city neighbourhoods," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 54(4), pages 1016-1037, March.
    3. Kadri Leetmaa & Tiit Tammaru & Kristi Anniste, 2009. "From Priority‐Led To Market‐Led Suburbanisation In A Post‐Communist Metropolis," Tijdschrift voor Economische en Sociale Geografie, Royal Dutch Geographical Society KNAG, vol. 100(4), pages 436-453, September.
    4. Tim Schwanen & Martin Dijst & Frans M. Dieleman, 2004. "Policies for Urban Form and their Impact on Travel: The Netherlands Experience," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 41(3), pages 579-603, March.
    5. Tom Kauko & Roland Goetgeluk, 2005. "Spatial and multidimensional analysis of the Dutch housing market using the Kohonen Map and GIS," ERSA conference papers ersa05p91, European Regional Science Association.
    6. Ong, C., 2014. "Tipping points? Ethnic composition change in Dutch big city neighbourhoods," MERIT Working Papers 2014-011, United Nations University - Maastricht Economic and Social Research Institute on Innovation and Technology (MERIT).
    7. Arjen J. Van Der Burg & Frans M. Dieleman, 2004. "Dutch Urbanisation Policies: From ‘Compact City’ to ‘Urban Network’," Tijdschrift voor Economische en Sociale Geografie, Royal Dutch Geographical Society KNAG, vol. 95(1), pages 108-116, February.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:envira:v:39:y:2007:i:6:p:1497-1512. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.